Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39985097›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2025

Experimental efficacy of vaccination of weaned piglets with a modified-live commercial PRRS virus vaccine against the challenge with a Spanish highly virulent PRRSV-1 strain.

M Cortey, M Jiménez, L Aguirre, J M Sánchez-Carvajal, J Gómez-Laguna, I Domingo-Carreño, H Clilverd, M Marcos, R Menjon, S Von Berg and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

M CorteyDepartment of Animal Health and Anatomy, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Travessera Dels Turons S/N, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain. marti.cortey@uab.cat.
M JiménezMSD Animal Health, Carbajosa de la Sagrada, Spain.
L AguirreDepartment of Animal Health and Anatomy, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Travessera Dels Turons S/N, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
J M Sánchez-CarvajalDepartment Anatomy and Comparative Pathology and Toxicology, Pathology and Immunology Group (UCO-PIG), UIC Zoonosis y Enfermedades Emergentes (ENZOEM), International Excellence Agrifood Campus 'CeiA3", University of Córdoba, 14014, Córdoba, Spain.
J Gómez-LagunaDepartment Anatomy and Comparative Pathology and Toxicology, Pathology and Immunology Group (UCO-PIG), UIC Zoonosis y Enfermedades Emergentes (ENZOEM), International Excellence Agrifood Campus 'CeiA3", University of Córdoba, 14014, Córdoba, Spain.
I Domingo-CarreñoDepartment of Animal Health and Anatomy, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Travessera Dels Turons S/N, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
H ClilverdDepartment of Animal Health and Anatomy, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Travessera Dels Turons S/N, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
M MarcosMSD Animal Health, Carbajosa de la Sagrada, Spain.
R MenjonMSD Animal Health, Carbajosa de la Sagrada, Spain.
S Von BergMSD Animal Health, Munich, Germany.
E MateuDepartment of Animal Health and Anatomy, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Travessera Dels Turons S/N, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2020, a highly virulent PRRSV-1 strain emerged in Spain and rapidly spread across the country. The purpose of the present study was to test in a piglet model whether a commercial PRRSV-1 modified live vaccine was able to confer protection against strain R1, a representative of the emerging clade. For that purpose, two groups of 26 piglets were either vaccinated intradermally or kept as controls; 42 days later, half of the animals in each group were intranasally challenged with the R1 strain. Then, animals were followed to assess the development of clinical signs (until 14 days post-challenge), lung lesions (10- and 35-days post-challenge), weight gains, viremia and nasal shedding and the immune response (anti PRRS virus nucleoprotein antibodies) by ELISA and virus specific-interferon-γ secreting cells by ELISPOT).

resultsChallenge of naïve pigs resulted in high fever (up to 41.9 °C), lethargy and severely retarded growth (0.748 kg/day). In contrast, vaccinated/challenged pigs had less fever and for a shorter period, lower clinical scores and a higher average daily weight gain (0.940 kg/day), comparable to the unchallenged animals. At 10 days-post challenge, in naïve animals on average 49.1% of the lung was pneumonic (range 8-81%) while in vaccinated animals the average was 15.7% (4-41%). Duration of viremia was reduced in vaccinated animals and after 14 days post-challenge, most were negative by RT-qPCR. In contrast, 50% of the naïve/challenged pigs remained viremic at 35 days post-challenge. Vaccination induced rapid seroconversion and challenge of naïve animals resulted in 100% of ELISA-positive pigs by day 14 post-challenge. Regarding the development of IFN-γ responses, for vaccinated animals the frequencies increased until day 35 post-vaccination. After challenge, in vaccinated pigs, the peak of the R1-specific IFN-γ response was reached at 14 days and then the viremia ceased, although nasal shedding persisted in some vaccinated animals.

conclusionsIn the present trial, vaccination resulted in improved clinical course, better weight gain and reduced viremia. At the peak of the infection, lung lesions were reduced in most animals although some individuals still had extensive pneumonia. In summary, vaccination was shown to provide partial but significant protection against the highly virulent R1 strain.

Indexed as

PigPorcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virusVaccineVirulence

Identifiers

PMID39985097
PMCPMC11846179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.