ArticleCardio-oncology (London, England)2025
Percutaneous coronary intervention-lobectomy for Lung Cancer hybrid surgery: an initial case series.
Article in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Research Progress in the Treatment and Prognosis of Comorbid Coronary Heart Disease and Lung Cancer.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFor patients diagnosed with both lung cancer and severe coronary heart disease (CHD), the conflict between revascularization and lung cancer surgery remains to be settled to balance how to attenuate the cardiovascular risk for lung surgery and shorten the waiting time of anti-platelet therapy after revascularization. This study presents the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-lobectomy for lung cancer hybrid surgery (PLHS), and its antithrombotic therapeutic strategy.
methodsFrom October 2020 to June 2023, 14 patients, with unstable angina and resectable lung cancer received PLHS. All procedures were performed in a hybrid operating room. Drug-eluting stents (DES) were implanted during PCI. Lobectomy was carried out within one hour after PCI.
resultsProcedural success was 100%. All the patients subjected to PLHS were alive after 12 months of follow-up; 2 patients (14.29%) died due to distant metastasis within 12-24 months post-PLHS. There were no intraoperative complications, or 30-day- and 3-month-mortality. Except for one patient who suffered pneumothorax, no other postoperative complications, including severe bleeding, or in-stent restenosis, occurred in the 31.7 ± 10.9 months follow-up.
conclusionsPLHS is a feasible and potentially safe option for patients with both lung cancer and severe CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.