ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2025
Prevalence of CNVs on the X chromosome in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders.
Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Xq26.2 Contiguous Gene Deletion InvolvingGenes · 2026Article
- Role of CNTN6 in neurodevelopment and neuropathology.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe X chromosome is enriched with genes related to brain development, and the hemizygous state of these genes in men causes some difficulties in the clinical interpretation of copy number variations (CNVs). In this study, we present data on the frequency and spectrum of CNVs on the X chromosome in a cohort of patients with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs).
methodsChromosomal microarray analysis was performed for 1175 patients with NDDs. CNVs were confirmed by real-time quantitative PCR. X chromosome inactivation was analysed by methyl-sensitive PCR. To determine the pathogenic significance of the CNVs, several criteria, including the origin (inherited or de novo), variant type (microdeletion or microduplication), and X chromosome inactivation pattern in asymptomatic and symptomatic carriers, were considered. Additionally, the spectrum, size and molecular bases of copy number changes in genes or gene regions involved in the development of the pathological phenotype in each patient were considered.
resultsCNVs on the X chromosome were identified in 33 patients (2.8%). Duplications and triplications (27 cases) were four times more common than deletions (6 cases). In 74% of patients, CNVs were of maternal origin; in 10% they were of paternal origin; and in 16% they arose de novo. The frequency of skewed X inactivation among family members who were healthy carriers of pathogenic and likely pathogenic CNVs and variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) on the X chromosome was 23%. For the first time, we reported several CNVs, including a pathogenic microdeletion at Xq26.1q26.2 involving the ARHGAP36 gene and a microduplication at Xp22.2 involving the OFD1 gene,
conclusionsThis study expands on the frequency and spectrum of CNVs in patients with NDDs. Pathogenic variants on the X chromosome were present in 15% of cases, LP in 12%, VUS in 57%, and LB in 16% of cases. Previously unreported CNVs aid in the identification of new structural variants and genes associated with X-linked intellectual disability. We propose to consider the X-chromosome inactivation status when assessing the pathogenetic significance of CNVs using the ACMG algorithm (American College of Medical Genetics).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.