ArticleTrials2025
The efficacy of computerized cognitive training in patients with coronary heart disease and cognitive impairment, no dementia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05735041 (The Efficacy of Computerized Cognitive Training in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease and Cognitive Impairment, no Dementia), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Efficacy of Computerized Cognitive Training in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease and Cognitive Impairment, no Dementia: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCognitive training has been confirmed to significantly improve the overall cognitive function in patients. For patients with coronary heart disease, in addition to controlling common risk factors, there is a lack of effective evidence for the treatment of cognitive function in patients with coronary heart disease and its effectiveness. This randomized controlled study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of computer-based cognitive training for improving cognitive function in such patients.
methodsCOG-T CHD is a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-designed, randomized controlled trial. The patients will be divided 1:1 into two groups by a central randomized system, a cognitive digital therapy group or a positive control group. Patients assigned to the cognitive digital therapy group will undergo computer-based cognitive training for 30 min at least five times a week for 12 weeks. At the end of the 12 weeks, the subjects were randomly divided into two groups. One group continued the 12 weeks of cognitive digital therapy training and the other group stopped the training. Patients assigned to the positive control group will undergo computer-based cognitive training with little or no difficulty changes for 30 min at least five times a week for 12 weeks. The study will last approximately 2 years, with enrollment completed in approximately 18 months, with the last enrolled patient followed for at least 24 weeks. The primary outcome is the proportion of improvement in overall cognitive function at 12 weeks, using the Basic Cognitive Ability Test (BCAT). Secondary outcomes are the proportion of improvement in the overall cognitive function from baseline at 24 weeks, the change in overall cognitive function scores at 12 and 24 weeks, and the proportion of improvement in each cognitive domain, General Self-Efficacy Scale score, EuroQol five-dimension three-level questionnaire score, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score at 12 and 24 weeks from baseline. The investigational outcome is the change in head MRI structure and function from baseline at weeks 12/24. DISCUSSION: COG-T CHD is the first clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of computer-based cognitive training in patients with coronary heart disease, filling an important gap in the treatment evidence for cognitive digital therapy.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05735041. Registered on Jan. 18, 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.