ReviewEcho research and practice2025
Multi-societal expert consensus statement on the safe administration of ultrasound contrast agents.
Review in Echo research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reported safety events from ultrasound enhancing agents: a critical reappraisal.Echo research and practice · 2026Article
- Development of a screening checklist to identify individuals with suspected allergy to polyethylene glycol.Echo research and practice · 2025Article
- Ultrasound-responsive micro/nanobubbles based intelligent theranostic systems for precision tumor therapy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Ultrasound targeted microbubbles for theranostic applications in liver diseases: from molecular imaging to targeted therapy.Drug delivery · 2025Review
- Standardizing Safety Practices for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Radiology.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025Article
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasound as a non-invasive diagnostic modality for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: The question of Ki67 for study validation.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- How to Perform Cardiac Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (cCEUS): Part II-Advanced Applications and Interpretation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- How to Perform Cardiac Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (cCEUS): Part I.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) offers a safe, reliable imaging option to establish a clinical diagnosis across a variety of multidisciplinary settings. This Expert Consensus Statement serves to outline expert opinion on what constitutes appropriate supervision and the essential components of safe CEUS practice. The purpose of this document is to empower institutions to allow sonographers, along with other trained medical professionals, to administer UCAs at the point of care, consistent with the updated scope of practice documentation and within the broad parameters of an individual's training and licensure, while subject to appropriate supervision and meeting or exceeding minimum safety standards. This guidance was developed by the International Contrast Ultrasound Society and endorsed by the following organizations that represent ultrasound professionals: the British Society of Echocardiography, the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, the Society for Pediatric Radiology, the World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, the Brazilian College of Radiology, the Joint Review Committee for Diagnostic Medical Sonography, the Chinese Ultrasound Doctors Association, and the American Society of Neuroimaging. Additionally, this guidance document was affirmed or supported by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Association for Medical Ultrasound, and the Society for Vascular Ultrasound.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.