Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39985013›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2025

Phase one of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study to assess the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of implementing seasonal malaria chemoprevention in Nampula Province, Mozambique.

Kevin Baker, Ivan Alejandro Pulido Tarquino, Pedro Aide, Craig Bonnington, Christian Rassi, Sol Richardson, Chuks Nnaji, Arantxa Roca-Feltrer, Maria Rodrigues, Mercia Sitoe and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Parasitological efficacy of seasonal malaria chemoprevention in Nampula, northern Mozambique.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kevin Baker *Malaria Consortium, London, UK. kevin.baker@ki.se.
Ivan Alejandro Pulido Tarquino *Malaria Consortium, Maputo, Mozambique.
Pedro Aide *National Institute of Health (Instituto Nacional de Saúde), Maputo, Mozambique.
Craig BonningtonMalaria Consortium, London, UK.
Christian RassiMalaria Consortium, London, UK.
Sol RichardsonMalaria Consortium, London, UK.
Chuks NnajiMalaria Consortium, London, UK.
Arantxa Roca-FeltrerPATH, Maputo, Mozambique.
Maria RodriguesMalaria Consortium, Maputo, Mozambique.
Mercia SitoeMalaria Consortium, Maputo, Mozambique.
Sonia EnosseMalaria Consortium, Maputo, Mozambique.
Caitlin McGuganGiveWell, San Francisco, USA.
Francisco SauteCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Manhiça, Mozambique.
Gloria MatambissoCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Manhiça, Mozambique.
Baltazar CandrinhoNational Malaria Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) is a highly effective intervention for malaria prevention in high burden areas with seasonal transmission, historically implemented in the Sahel. Mozambique contributes to 4% of global malaria cases. Malaria Consortium, in partnership with the National Malaria Control Programme, conducted a two-year phased SMC study in Nampula province using sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) plus amodiaquine (AQ), or SPAQ, in children under five. Phase one results presented here highlight acceptability, feasibility, and protective effect of SMC.

methodsA pragmatic type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation study design was adopted, using mixed methods. The study was conducted in three districts, utilizing: (1) non-randomized controlled trial reporting on malaria incidence; (2) drug resistance molecular marker study reporting on resistance marker changes over time; (3) coverage and quality assessment on the SMC distribution; and (4) a qualitative acceptability and feasibility assessment with stakeholders.

resultsChildren who received SMC had 86% (hazard ratio 0.14, 95% CI 0.09-0.24) lower hazards of developing clinical malaria during the peak transmission season compared with children in the comparison district. Prevalence of SP molecular markers associated with resistance was high at baseline (K540E 66.1%). SMC achieved high coverage of eligible children over four cycles (87.7%, 95% CI 83.9-90.8%). Qualitative results indicate SMC was positively accepted by the targeted community.

conclusionsResults suggest that SMC was effective at preventing clinical malaria, did not significantly impact resistance profile, and was feasible and acceptable in the context. Phase two will assess SMC impact in reducing malaria incidence and if chemoprevention efficacy of SPAQ is impacted by drug resistance and drug concentrations.

Indexed as

AmodiaquineAntimalarialsChemopreventionMalariaPatient Acceptance of Health CarePyrimethamineSulfadoxineChild, PreschoolDrug CombinationsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantMaleMozambiqueAmodiaquineAntimalarialsDrug Combinationsfanasil, pyrimethamine drug combinationPyrimethamineSulfadoxineSeasonal malaria chemoprevention Mozambique children

Identifiers

PMID39985013
PMCPMC11846204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.