Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39984979›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2025

Cost-effectiveness of nirsevimab and maternal RSVpreF for preventing respiratory syncytial virus disease in infants across Canada.

Samara Bugden, Shweta Mital, Hai V Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samara BugdenSchool of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada. sb6621@mun.ca.
Shweta MitalCollege of Pharmacy, Apotex Centre, University of Manitoba, 750 McDermot Avenue West, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0T5, Canada.
Hai V NguyenSchool of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNirsevimab, a long-acting monoclonal antibody, and RSVpreF, a maternal vaccine, are newly approved respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prophylactics for infants in Canada. Both have the potential to expand prevention efforts, but there is limited evidence regarding their cost-effectiveness and how it varies across the country, despite disparate hospitalisation rates and resource use among different populations.

methodsWe developed a decision tree model to follow twelve monthly birth cohorts through their first year of life, incorporating risk differentiation based on Canadian region, prematurity, and comorbidities. The model tracked medically attended infections, including hospitalisations, intensive care unit admissions, and outpatient visits, comparing costs (in 2024 Canadian dollars) and effectiveness (in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)) of nine different immunisation strategies compared to no intervention. The analysis was conducted from both healthcare and societal perspectives. We conducted threshold price analyses, varying the price-per-dose of each product to determine the threshold prices at which expanded coverage becomes cost-effective.

resultsAt base case prices, the optimal strategy varies by region, but in all cases, the optimal strategy is both cost-saving and more effective than no intervention. In southern Canada, it is optimal to immunise only palivizumab-eligible infants (those born very prematurely or with high-risk comorbidities) with nirsevimab, resulting in cost savings of $4.14 and QALY gains of 0.000022 QALY per infant compared to no intervention. In the Northwest Territories, it is best to expand protection with nirsevimab to include all preterm infants (cost savings of $28.68 and QALY gains of 0.00007 per infant). In Nunavik and Nunavut, immunising all infants under 6 months and all infants under twelve months with nirsevimab are the best strategies, respectively (cost savings of $399.61 and QALY gains of 0.000821 per infant in Nunavik, and cost savings of $1067.03 and QALY gains of 0.000884 per infant in Nunavut). Universal, country-wide immunisation with nirsevimab would require a price-per-dose of under $112 to become the most cost-effective prevention strategy.

conclusionsThe optimal strategy for preventing respiratory syncytial virus disease in Canadian infants depends on product price and regional risk level and resource use. Canadian policy should account for these factors.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntiviral AgentsRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsRespiratory Syncytial Virus VaccinesCanadaCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision TreesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntiviral AgentsRespiratory Syncytial Virus VaccinesCost-effectiveness analysisMaternal vaccinationMonoclonal antibodiesRespiratory syncytial virus

Identifiers

PMID39984979
PMCPMC11846277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.