ArticleTrials2025
Effect of perioperative remote ischemic conditioning on myocardial injury in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: protocol of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of Xueshuantong injection on myocardial injury and residual cardiovascular risk in patients with unstable angina.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death, with ischemic heart disease being a significant contributor. While percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) effectively reduces mortality in myocardial infarction patients, its efficacy for unstable angina (UA) patients is controversial. Complications associated with PCI further limit application in UA. RIC is hypothesized to be an effective co-intervention that reduces PCI-related complications and may potentially enhance the efficacy of the PCI procedure itself.
methodsThis is a pragmatic, prospective, dual-center, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial assessing the effect of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on injury in unstable angina patients aged ≥ 18 years undergoing coronary angiography. Participants will be randomized to receive either RIC or Sham RIC, in addition to standard pharmacotherapy. Primary outcome includes periprocedural myocardial injury measured by hs-cTnT levels, while secondary outcomes encompass major adverse cardiovascular events, coronary artery lesions Gensini Score, arrhythmia, angina incidence, SAQ scores, ECG changes, and cardiac function assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography. The trial aims to recruit 574 participants and is scheduled to be initiated on 15 January 2024. We will conduct the primary statistical analysis using the intention-to-treat principle. Results from the trial will be presented as comparative summary statistics following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines.
trial registrationChiCTR2400079855, 15 January 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.