Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39984960›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

"We just have to work with what we've got": a qualitative analysis of contextual challenges in facilities and resources for pupil physical activity in English primary schools.

Danielle House, Robert Walker, Lydia Emm-Collison, Simona Kent-Saisch, Ruth Salway, Alice Porter, Frank de Vocht, Russell Jago

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Danielle HousePopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Danielle.House@bristol.ac.uk.
Robert WalkerPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Lydia Emm-CollisonCentre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Simona Kent-SaischPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Ruth SalwayPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Alice PorterPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Frank de VochtPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Russell JagoPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

UK Research and Innovation EP/X023508/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundState primary schools present an opportunity to support children's physical activity equitably, however, many school-based physical activity interventions have been unsuccessful. Many interventions have focused on school built environments to increase or measure the physical infrastructure a school has. Yet literature suggests that broader social and institutional factors, such as school policies and staffing, are equally crucial for supporting pupil's physical activity. The aim of this study is to qualitatively explore and assess primary school staff perspectives on the role of school facilities and resources in supporting pupil physical activity and the factors that impact their use.

methodsWe conducted 33 semi-structured interviews with state primary school staff in the Bristol area, Southwest England, between November 2023 and January 2024. Staff roles included headteacher/principal (n = 5), deputy headteacher/principal (n = 6), class teacher (n = 7), teaching assistant (n = 2), Physical Education (PE) subject lead (n = 8), dedicated PE teachers (n = 4), and Parent Teacher Association chair (n = 1). Staff were recruited from 19 purposively-sampled schools with a range of school sizes, locations, and sociodemographic characteristics. Reflexive thematic analysis was used.

resultsFive themes were generated related to how school facilities and resources impact pupil physical activity: 1) Facilities and resources create potential for pupil physical activity, 2) A social context supportive of physical activity is needed to maximise this potential, 3) Logistical challenges undermine the potential of facilities and resources, 4) The potential of facilities and resources change throughout the school year, and 5) Facilities and resources are not always fit for purpose.

conclusionThe presence of facilities or resources alone does not determine pupil physical activity at primary school. Factors such as the social context of the school, logistical and timetabling challenges, seasonality, and how fit for purpose facilities are for that school, are important factors in school staff and pupils' use and management of these facilities, and whether their potential is maximised or undermined. Future research and policy must broaden the focus from the presence of facilities and resources for physical activity, to include a focus on how these are maintained and engaged with in a school's specific context.

Indexed as

ExercisePhysical Education and TrainingPupilSchoolsChildEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchBuilt environmentChildrenContextPhysical activityPrimary schoolsSchool-basedTailored-intervention

Identifiers

PMID39984960
PMCPMC11846469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.