Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39984951›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Facilitators and barriers to participation and scale-up of a non-specialist delivered psychological intervention for adolescents in low-resourced settings: a process evaluation.

Alissa M Terp, Rand Habashneh, Felicity L Brown, Adnan Abualhaija, Ibrahim S Aqel, Maha Ghatasheh, Richard Bryant, Mark J D Jordans, Aiysha Malik, Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alissa M TerpSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Rand HabashnehInstitute for Family Health, King Hussein Foundation, Amman, Jordan.
Felicity L BrownResearch and Development Department, War Child Alliance, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Adnan AbualhaijaInstitute for Family Health, King Hussein Foundation, Amman, Jordan.
Ibrahim S AqelInstitute for Family Health, King Hussein Foundation, Amman, Jordan.
Maha GhatashehInstitute for Family Health, King Hussein Foundation, Amman, Jordan.
Richard BryantSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Mark J D JordansResearch and Development Department, War Child Alliance, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Aiysha MalikDepartment of Mental Health, Brain Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ellenor Mittendorfer-RutzDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Aemal AkhtarSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. aemal.akhtar@ki.se.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, the number of refugees and displaced individuals has surpassed 100 million for the first time in history. Refugees are more likely than non-refugee populations to experience psychological distress and develop mental disorders. Early Adolescent Skills for Emotion (EASE), developed by the World Health Organization, is a potentially scalable task-sharing intervention targeting symptoms of internalizing disorders such as depression and anxiety for 10-15 years old and their caregiver. Prior to this study a randomized controlled trial in Amman, Jordan was conducted showing effectiveness of EASE reducing caregiver distress and inconsistent disciplinary parenting as well as reducing internalizing problems in adolescence. This study aims to explore individual and contextual barriers and facilitators for scaling the EASE intervention for Syrian refugees in Jordan. Ten semi-structured interviews and four focus group discussions were conducted between October 2020 and February 2023 with five key mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) informants, eight EASE providers, 11 adolescents, and 12 caregivers. Purposeful quota sampling technique was used to recruit participants with attention to sex and age and number of interviews and focus group discussions determined through empirical saturation. Inductive and deductive codes were utilized in a six-step thematic analysis. Participants reported a beneficial impact of EASE sessions in terms of reducing experienced anxiety levels, improved communication between adolescents and caregivers, reduced feelings of anger and jealousy, and improved familial relationships. Individual participation was hampered by transportation issues, scheduling conflicts, gender-mixed groups, and competing responsibilities. Scale-up facilitators included; increased mental health awareness, perceived low cost of EASE, feasibility of delivery by non-specialists, and an intervention engaging both adolescents and caregivers. Barriers included location, online sessions, sustainability, general implementation issues caused by individual barriers, and some concerns about non-specialists. Results add nuances not detected in the previous randomized control trial in Jordan and provide important context for understanding effectiveness results. Future research should investigate the cost-effectiveness of EASE along with stepped-care implementation models to provide EASE within existing health systems.

Indexed as

Psychosocial InterventionRefugeesAdolescentCaregiversChildFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicJordanMaleQualitative ResearchSyriaAdolescentsHumanitarian emergenciesLow- and middle-income countriesMental healthPsychological interventionRefugees

Identifiers

PMID39984951
PMCPMC11846470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.