Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39984940›Full record

SynthesisTrials2025

Enablers and barriers of clinical trial participation in adult patients from minority ethnic groups: a systematic review.

Germán Andrés Alarcón Garavito, Katie Gilchrist, Coziana Ciurtin, Sanjay Khanna, Pinkie Chambers, Nick McNally, Edward Merivale, Edi Carr, Rosamund Yu, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Building the Oncology Workforce: A Qualitative Evaluation of an Inter-Institutional Cancer Research Internship for Underrepresented Undergraduate Students.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Germán Andrés Alarcón GaravitoRapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL), University College London, London, UK.
Katie GilchristRapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL), University College London, London, UK.
Coziana CiurtinUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH), London, UK.
Sanjay KhannaRoche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Pinkie ChambersUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH), London, UK.
Nick McNallyUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH), London, UK.
Edward MerivaleRoche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Edi CarrPublic Contributor, London, UK.
Rosamund YuUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH), London, UK.
Cecilia Vindrola-PadrosRapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL), University College London, London, UK. c.vindrola@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical trials are essential to the development of healthcare innovations that advance life expectancy and improve quality of life. However, there exists a pronounced disparity in ethnic representation among trial participants. This imbalance, particularly in relation to minority ethnic groups, can lead to a limited understanding of how therapies affect diverse populations. The present systematic literature review (SLR) aims to identify the factors that both hinder and facilitate the participation of minority ethnic groups in clinical trials.

methodsThis review involved a systematic search of keywords across four databases: Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL Plus and The Cochrane Library. The review was not restricted by language or study site; however, the date of publication was limited between 1st January 2017 and 1st October 2022. Studies discussing or outlining the involvement of minority ethnic groups in clinical trials, and those outlining inclusive recruitment and participation procedures were targeted.

resultsA total of 43 articles were included in the review. Of these, 36 articles were from the United States (US), 20 articles reported on oncology trials and 39 articles reported information from the patient's perspective. Reported barriers included a lack of researchers from minority ethnic groups implementing and conducting clinical research, inadequate funding for clinical trial efforts in geographical areas serving minority populations and a lack of awareness and education among research staff regarding which underrepresented groups to target for recruitment and the strategies to employ in reaching out to them. Several recommendations were suggested by the articles included in the review to address these barriers. Prominently, the use of patient navigators or community liaison roles was highly recommended as a way of supporting patients through the research recruitment process. The articles also highlighted the benefits of translating study materials and interventions into multiple languages and actively involving diverse communities in the development of health education materials. Lastly, leveraging technologies to address socioeconomic barriers, such as the use of virtual approaches to avoid lengthy travel, may also help to improve diversity in trials.

conclusionsEnsuring representation of minority ethnic groups in clinical trials is critical to developing therapies with generalisable efficacies. While progress has been made in enhancing outreach of wider racial groups and fortifying educational resources, there remains a pressing need to delve deeper into the obstacles impeding the recruitment of a diverse participant base, particularly in regions outside the US, where relevant studies are scarce. REGISTRATION: The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022368106) (1).

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicEthnicityMinority GroupsPatient ParticipationPatient SelectionAdultHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansBarriers and facilitatorsClinical trialsInclusivityRecruitmentSystematic reviewUnderrepresentation

Identifiers

PMID39984940
PMCPMC11846389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.