SynthesisTrials2025
Enablers and barriers of clinical trial participation in adult patients from minority ethnic groups: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Strategies to reach, involve, and maintain underserved populations in health intervention research: a systematic review of reviews.International journal for equity in health · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Characterizing the Objective Time Spent on Health Care Activities in Clinic and at Home for Patients With Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Guidance for Community Engagement With Underserved Populations in Cancer Care.JCO oncology practice · 2026Article
- Exploring Prolonged Grief Experiences of Ethnoracial Minoritized Caregivers: An Emic Perspective.Research in nursing & health · 2026Article
- Understanding recruitment challenges in Swiss oncology trials: Patient voices from focus groups.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
- Bridging policy gaps in clinical trial volunteering: public and healthcare professional perspectives in England.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2026Article
- An Equity-Embedded, Protocol-Agnostic Pre-Trial Navigation Model for Canadian Blood Cancer Trials: Findings from the Myeloma Canada Phase 0 Workshop.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Vulnerability, protection and fairness: ethical and regulatory limits in small-N gene therapy trials.Trials · 2026Article
- Drivers of Research Participation Among Racially and Ethnically Underrepresented Women: Insights from Semi-Structured Interviews.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Article
- Building the Oncology Workforce: A Qualitative Evaluation of an Inter-Institutional Cancer Research Internship for Underrepresented Undergraduate Students.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Article
- Predictors of Clinical Trial Participation Among Older U.S. Adults With Multimorbidity: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- The Perspectives of Patients and Community Health Workers on the Recruitment and Retention of Latino Individuals in Research in Dialysis: A Qualitative Study.Kidney medicine · 2026Article
- Group-Based Medical Mistrust and Logistical Factors Influencing Rheumatology Clinical Trial Enrollment: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Survey.ACR open rheumatology · 2026Article
- Article
- Patient involvement in the development of childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivorship guidelines: recommendations from EU-CAYAS-NET ambassadors.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- The Clinical Trial Referral Ambassadors program to promote clinical trial referrals within rural community hospitals: A formative program evaluation study.Contemporary clinical trials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical trials are essential to the development of healthcare innovations that advance life expectancy and improve quality of life. However, there exists a pronounced disparity in ethnic representation among trial participants. This imbalance, particularly in relation to minority ethnic groups, can lead to a limited understanding of how therapies affect diverse populations. The present systematic literature review (SLR) aims to identify the factors that both hinder and facilitate the participation of minority ethnic groups in clinical trials.
methodsThis review involved a systematic search of keywords across four databases: Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL Plus and The Cochrane Library. The review was not restricted by language or study site; however, the date of publication was limited between 1st January 2017 and 1st October 2022. Studies discussing or outlining the involvement of minority ethnic groups in clinical trials, and those outlining inclusive recruitment and participation procedures were targeted.
resultsA total of 43 articles were included in the review. Of these, 36 articles were from the United States (US), 20 articles reported on oncology trials and 39 articles reported information from the patient's perspective. Reported barriers included a lack of researchers from minority ethnic groups implementing and conducting clinical research, inadequate funding for clinical trial efforts in geographical areas serving minority populations and a lack of awareness and education among research staff regarding which underrepresented groups to target for recruitment and the strategies to employ in reaching out to them. Several recommendations were suggested by the articles included in the review to address these barriers. Prominently, the use of patient navigators or community liaison roles was highly recommended as a way of supporting patients through the research recruitment process. The articles also highlighted the benefits of translating study materials and interventions into multiple languages and actively involving diverse communities in the development of health education materials. Lastly, leveraging technologies to address socioeconomic barriers, such as the use of virtual approaches to avoid lengthy travel, may also help to improve diversity in trials.
conclusionsEnsuring representation of minority ethnic groups in clinical trials is critical to developing therapies with generalisable efficacies. While progress has been made in enhancing outreach of wider racial groups and fortifying educational resources, there remains a pressing need to delve deeper into the obstacles impeding the recruitment of a diverse participant base, particularly in regions outside the US, where relevant studies are scarce. REGISTRATION: The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022368106) (1).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.