ArticleBMC public health2025
How an urban regeneration programme impact people's health and wellbeing: an evaluation from citizen's perception using concept mapping.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Urban health research: shaping integrated policies for health, equity, sustainability, and climate.European journal of public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUrban regeneration programmes have an impact on health of residents in the areas where they are implemented. However, it is still unclear which changes inside these programmes drive the impact on health and social determinants of health. In this study, we uncover the main changes inside the PdB driving the impact on health and well-being from the residents' perceptions in a neighbourhood of Barcelona.
methodsWe used a mixed methodology, employing concept mapping (CM) method. Our study was performed in the Barcelona neighbourhood of La Verneda i La Pau. To collect and analyse residents' perceptions of changes, we used a three-stage group sessions. We split the population into groups by age and sex and analysed the differences between the groups.
resultsIn total, 45 people participated and were divided into five age-sex groups. Most changes inside the PdB were perceived as positive for health by all the groups. These included community activities for healthy leisure at local centres, as well as changes to public space. However, some changes related to noise from the implementation of works were perceived as negative for health. Differences between age-sex groups were especially related to mobility and the different uses of public space.
conclusionsThe results are consistent with previous quantitative health evaluations and provide deeper insight into the changes inside urban regeneration programmes that drive the impact on health. Finally, it provides guidance for designing new programmes considering age and gender.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.