Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39984933›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

"MORAD ESCAPE", a novel research-based escape room approach for evaluating research competencies of health professions students.

Arvin Mirshahi, Ali Khanipour-Kencha, Sogol Keyvanpour, Maryam Karbasi Motlagh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arvin MirshahiStudent Scientific Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Mirshahiarvin13750@gamil.com.
Ali Khanipour-KenchaStudent Scientific Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sogol KeyvanpourStudent Scientific Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam Karbasi MotlaghStudent Scientific Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. m-karbasimotlagh@sina.tums.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEscape rooms offer an engaging platform to assess skills such as information retrieval, teamwork, leadership, and learning processes. Beyond their educational utility, escape rooms serve as a valuable system for complementing traditional evaluation methods. They provide a dual role as both an innovative educational and assessment tool, offering a novel approach to fostering and evaluating essential competencies. Research skills, particularly vital in medical sciences, require such innovative evaluation approaches. This study aimed to assess the research competencies of students at Tehran University of Medical Sciences using a research-based escape room.

methodsThis sequential exploratory mixed-methods study was conducted in three phases: design, implementation, and evaluation, between February 29, 2024, and July 1, 2024. The escape room was designed using the EscapED model, involving a literature review, expert input, and the development of two tools: a research competency checklist and a game evaluation scale. After piloting, 60 eligible medical students (12 groups of five) voluntarily participated in the activity, conducted over two days with six 90-minute sessions per day. The evaluation phase assessed game design and team performance using the validated tools.

resultsFollowing validation and reliability testing of the tools, 60 participants (mean age 21.05 ± 1.65 years; 58.45% male, 41.6% female) completed the activity. Most were undergraduates (91.6%) and medical students (81.6%). The mean raw score on the research competency checklist was 336 ± 137.1 (range: 112.5-500). Negative scores averaged 38.8 ± 20.9, and final scores averaged 298 ± 150.1 (range: 42.5-485). The top three teams received research grants as prizes. The escape room was rated 3.7 ± 0.31 (out of 5) for overall experience, highlighting its effectiveness as an assessment tool.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the potential of escape rooms as dynamic tools for assessing research competencies in medical sciences education. Integrating gamified learning with structured evaluation frameworks and incentives fosters engagement and provides an innovative alternative to traditional assessments. Further studies should explore the scalability and adaptability of this approach in broader educational contexts.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchEducational MeasurementHealth OccupationsStudents, MedicalFemaleHumansIranMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultEscape roomsGamificationResearch competenciesSerious games

Identifiers

PMID39984933
PMCPMC11846363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.