Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39984901›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

Surgical vs. non-surgical management of cervical spine fractures associated with ankylosing spinal disorders: a matched retrospective comparison assessing mortality.

Josefin Åkerstedt, Ali Buwaider, Victor Gabriel El-Hajj, Johan Wänman, Henrik Frisk, Simon Blixt, Anna MacDowall, Erik Edström, Adrian Elmi-Terander, Anastasios Charalampidis

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Josefin ÅkerstedtDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Ali BuwaiderDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Victor Gabriel El-HajjDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan WänmanDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Henrik FriskDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Simon BlixtDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna MacDowallDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Erik EdströmDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Adrian Elmi-TeranderDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anastasios CharalampidisDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. anastasios.charalampidis@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnkylosing spinal disorders (ASD) increase the risk of unstable cervical spine fractures, posing a significant mortality risk. Surgery is recommended for patients with neurological deficits, but the effectiveness of non-surgical treatment in those without deficits remains unclear. This study aimed to compare survival rates between surgical and non-surgical treatments of ASD-related cervical fractures in a matched cohort.

methodsThe study analyzed data from the Swedish Fracture Registry (SFR) on adult patients treated for ASD-related cervical spine fractures between January 2015 and December 2021. Preoperative variables included age, sex, trauma type, neurological function, fracture morphology, and treatment method. Propensity score matching was conducted to compare outcomes between treatment groups, ensuring balanced comparison groups regarding age, sex, type of trauma, time from injury to admission, fracture type, level of injury, and neurological function.

resultsIn total, 357 adult patients with ASD-related cervical spine fractures were analyzed. Among them, 186 were treated surgically and 171 non-surgically. Treatment failure and conversion so surgical treatment was seen in 3.4% of the non-surgically treated patients. Most patients were male (80%), with a median age of 75 years. Fractures were mainly caused by low-energy trauma (69%). Most patients (92%) were ambulatory (Frankel grade D or E). In the unmatched analysis, surgically treated patients had significantly lower 1-year mortality rates (13% vs. 22%; p < 0.001), but after matching, there were no longer any difference between the two groups (16% vs. 22%; p = 0.44). These findings were also validated on Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified high age as the only predictor for 30-day mortality (OR 1.14 [95% CI 1.09-1.22], p < 0.001).

conclusionFollowing propensity score matching, surgical and conservative management result in similar mortality outcomes for neurologically intact patients with ASD fractures. Age, rather than treatment approach, emerged as a stronger predictor of overall mortality. Nonetheless, treatment decisions should also consider other clinical outcomes beyond mortality, emphasizing the need for an individualized approach until more robust evidence is available.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeConservative TreatmentSpinal FracturesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRegistriesRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateSwedenTreatment OutcomeAnkylosing spondylitisCervical spinal fractureDiffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosisMortalityNon-surgical treatmentSurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID39984901
PMCPMC11843765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.