Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39984889›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Single- versus multi-fraction spine stereotactic radiosurgery (ALL-STAR) for patients with spinal metastases: a randomized phase III trial protocol.

Aniket Pratapneni, Daniella Klebaner, Scott Gerard Soltys, Elham Rahimy, Iris Catrice Gibbs, Steven Daniel Chang, Gordon Li, Melanie Hayden Gephart, Anand Veeravagu, Gregory Arthur Szalkowski and 11 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Aniket PratapneniStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, US. aniket.pratapneni@ucsf.edu.
Daniella KlebanerStanford Medicine, Stanford, US.
Scott Gerard SoltysStanford Medicine, Stanford, US.
Elham RahimyStanford Medicine, Stanford, US.
Iris Catrice GibbsStanford Medicine, Stanford, US.
Steven Daniel ChangStanford Medicine, Stanford, US.
Gordon LiStanford Medicine, Stanford, US.
Melanie Hayden GephartStanford Medicine, Stanford, US.
Anand VeeravaguStanford Medicine, Stanford, US.
Gregory Arthur SzalkowskiStanford Medicine, Stanford, US.
Xuejun GuStanford Medicine, Stanford, US.
Lei WangStanford Medicine, Stanford, US.
Cynthia ChuangStanford Medicine, Stanford, US.
Lianli LiuStanford Medicine, Stanford, US.
Scott JacksonStanford Medicine, Stanford, US.
Rong LuStanford Medicine, Stanford, US.
Jillian Adele SkerchakStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, US.
Kelly Zhe HuangStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, US.
Samantha WongStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, US.
Eleanor BrownStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, US.
Erqi Liu PollomStanford Medicine, Stanford, US. erqiliu@stanford.edu.

Funding

Translational Oncology Research Program (Project-005)P30CA124435 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Melinda L. Telli · 2007 to 2026
$71.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA124435NIH HHS P30CA124435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor patients with spine metastases, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) provides excellent local control and pain response. Despite increasing use of this treatment modality, there is no consensus on the optimal dose and fractionation of spine SRS for efficacy and toxicity. We have initiated a single-center phase III randomized trial that compares two dose regimens with similar biological equivalent dose (BED) to determine the isolated effect of SRS fractionation on local control.

methodsPatients with one to three cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine metastases spanning no more than two contiguous vertebral levels in need of radiation will be eligible for enrollment. Patients will be assigned 1:1 to receive either 22 Gy in 1 fraction or 28 Gy in 2 fractions. Biased coin randomization will be used to randomly assign patients while balancing the following stratifying variables between the two treatment arms at baseline: gastrointestinal histology (yes/no), paraspinal tissue extension (yes/no), epidural compression (low-/high-grade), and number of sites treated (one to three). The primary endpoint is one-year local control, defined per Spine Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (SPINO) criteria. The secondary endpoints include patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL), pain associated with the treated site, vertebral compression fracture (VCF), and two-year local control. Patients will be followed for these outcomes at one to two weeks, one month, three months, and six months after treatment, and every six months thereafter until 24 months after treatment. While on the study, patients will receive routine co-interventions as clinically indicated. DISCUSSION: The studies published thus far comparing the single- and multi-fraction SRS are lacking long-term local control outcomes and are limited by selection bias as well as single-fraction arms with higher BED, which is correlated with improved local control. Our study will isolate the effect of fractionation by comparing one-year local control in patients treated with single- and multi-fraction SRS with equivalent BED. We anticipate that the results of this, as well as secondary endpoints such as pain response, adverse effects, and quality of life will provide much-needed guidance regarding optimal dose and fractionation for both maximizing local control and minimizing toxicity. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: NCT#06173401. Approved by Stanford Scientific Review Committee (study ID: BRN0060) on 9/12/2023 and Stanford Institutional Review Board (study ID: IRB-72248) on 11/14/2023.

Indexed as

RadiosurgerySpinal NeoplasmsAdultAgedClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39984889
PMCPMC11846292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.