Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39984867›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2025

Bone tumors: a systematic review of prevalence, risk determinants, and survival patterns.

Hasan Hosseini, Sina Heydari, Kiavash Hushmandi, Salman Daneshi, Rasoul Raesi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hasan HosseiniDepartment of Orthopedics, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Sina HeydariSchool of Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Jiroft University of Medical Science, Jiroft, Iran.
Kiavash HushmandiNephrology and Urology Research Center, Clinical Sciences Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Salman DaneshiDepartment of Public Health, School of Health, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran. salmandaneshi008@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9199-0382
Rasoul RaesiDepartment of Public Health, School of Health, Torbat Jam Faculty of Medical Sciences, Torbat Jam, Iran. Raesi.br881@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5998-5209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThough relatively rare, bone tumors significantly impact patient health and treatment outcomes.

objectiveThis systematic review analyzes the incidence, types, survival rates, and risk factors associated with bone tumors, including both benign and malignant forms.

methodsThis systematic review was conducted using the keywords "bone tumors," "epidemiology," "benign bone tumors," "malignant bone tumors," "osteosarcoma," "Ewing sarcoma," "chondrosarcoma," "risk factors," and "survival" in electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from 2000 to 2024. The search strategy was based on the PRISMA statement. Finally, 9 articles were selected for inclusion in the study.

resultsThe systematic review highlights that primary bone tumors can be classified into benign and malignant types, with osteosarcoma being the most prevalent malignant form, particularly among adolescents and young adults. The epidemiology of bone tumors is influenced by factors such as age, gender, geographic location, and genetic predispositions. Recent advancements in imaging techniques have improved the detection of these tumors, contributing to an increasing recognition of their prevalence. Data shows that the limited-duration prevalence of malignant bone tumors has increased significantly. This increase is from 0.00069% in 2000 to 0.00749% in 2018, indicating an increasing recognition and diagnosis of these rare tumors over time. Survival rates vary significantly by tumor type, with approximately 50-60% for osteosarcoma and around 70% for Ewing's sarcoma, though these rates decrease with metastasis. Key risk factors identified include genetic predispositions such as Li-Fraumeni syndrome and TP53 mutations, environmental exposures like radiation, and growth patterns related to height.

conclusionThe review highlights the importance of early diagnosis and treatment intervention, as survival rates are significantly better for patients with localized disease compared to those with metastatic conditions. The observed variations in survival rates across different tumor types underscore the need for tailored treatment strategies. Key risk factors include genetic predispositions and environmental exposures, highlighting the need for targeted screening and ongoing research to enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsOsteosarcomaAdolescentChondrosarcomaHumansIncidencePrevalenceRisk FactorsSarcoma, EwingSurvival RateBone tumorsDiagnostic imagingEpidemiologyIncidenceRisk factorsSurvival rates

Identifiers

PMID39984867
PMCPMC11846205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.