ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
A bundle-based approach on catheter-associated urinary tract infection: a multi-center study in Chinese tertiary hospitals.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The application of machine learning in the evaluation of urinary tract infections incidence in patients in a Nursing and Treatment Facility.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2026Article
- Evaluating nursing interventions to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection in ICU patients: a quasi-experimental study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Combating Healthcare-Associated Infections in Modern Hospitals: Nanotechnology-Based Approaches in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Barriers to the prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections in public hospitals: a qualitative study of Sistan and Baluchistan province, Iran.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Sensing Dog Brain Reactions to Smell by AI Speckle Pattern Analysis.Journal of biophotonics · 2025Article
- Urinary tract infections and stewardship practices - For a urologist (KIDNEY-AMSP model).Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCatheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are one of the most common types of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Current studies mainly focus on risk factors, but the method to control them is unresolved. We aim to give an overview of the epidemiology of CAUTIs and explore the effects of bundle intervention on intensive care unit (ICU) inpatients.
methodsA multi-center, double-blind, retrospective study was conducted in eight Xiamen medical centers over six months; we recruited ICU inpatients with indwelling urinary catheters (UC) > = 48 h. Data were analyzed using Chi-Square and student's t-test.
resultsWith bundle interventions, the CAUTI rate in ICUs decreased from 3.84 to 1.31 per 1000 UC days. The UC utilization was significantly reduced after bundles (71.29-62.70%), and the average duration of indwelling UC was reduced considerably (7,035 days vs. 6,884 days). CAUTIs in patients over 60 years old were significantly reduced after bundles. There were 45 causative organisms detected from 36 cases of CAUTIs, including 12 multidrug-resistant bacteria.
conclusionsBundles have been shown to reduce the risk of CAUTIs in patients with indwelling catheters in the ICU, especially older adults. It also significantly reduces the use of Carbapenem. Therefore, CAUTI bundles are recommended to clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.