ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2025
Golden hour management of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: 15 year experience at a high-volume center.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hemodynamic Phenotypes in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Unresolved Questions and Future Directions.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: are improvements in ECMO & survival sustainable over time?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Flow disruptions during delivery room intubation of neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.Resuscitation · 2025Observational
- Cardiorespiratory transition in CDH.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo review the evolution of golden hour management and outcomes for infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). STUDY
designRetrospective single center cohort study of infants with CDH born 2008-2023 at a quaternary children's hospital. Infants were grouped into 3 epochs: 2008-2013, 2014-2018, and 2019-2023. Outcome measures included extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy and survival.
resultThere were 454 infants, including 106 (2008-2013), 156 (2014-2018), and 192 (2019-2023). Despite increased disease severity, survival improved over time, from 71% (2008-2013) to 82% (2014-2018) and 83% (2019-2023), p = 0.02 for trend, with no difference in ECMO utilization.
conclusionManagement of infants with CDH continues to evolve with ongoing experience at our high-volume center. Despite increasing severity of illness, survival outcomes have improved over time. In the absence of clinical trial data, observational data should be evaluated rigorously to inform care in a data-driven manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.