Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39984716›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative study of third-generation sequencing-based CASMA-trio and STR linkage analysis for identifying SMN1 2 + 0 carriers.

Jianchun He, Wenzhi He, Jiajia Xian, Yanchao Wang, Xiaoyan Ma, Shuangru Lin, Jianfan Chen, Gaoyuan Xu, Qingqing Chen, Qing Li and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jianchun He *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Experimental Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, Guangdong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9975-0241
Wenzhi He *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Experimental Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, Guangdong, China.
Jiajia XianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Experimental Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, Guangdong, China.
Yanchao WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Experimental Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoyan MaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Experimental Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, Guangdong, China.
Shuangru LinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Experimental Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, Guangdong, China.
Jianfan ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Experimental Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, Guangdong, China.
Gaoyuan XuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Experimental Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, Guangdong, China.
Qingqing ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangzhou, 510150, Guangdong, China.
Qing LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Experimental Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, Guangdong, China. 81292522@163.com.
Shaoying LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Experimental Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, Guangdong, China. amyleewang@163.com.

Funding

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province 2021A1515220152Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou 2023A03J0395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA, MIM#253300) is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder caused by defects in the Survival Motor Neuron (SMN) gene. The SMN1 gene, recognized as the primary pathogenic gene for SMA, exhibits a high degree of sequence homology with SMN2 gene. Individuals with the SMN1 2 + 0 genotype represent a unique type of SMA carrier, characterized by two SMN1 copies on one chromosome and zero copies on the other. Accurate identification of this type of carrier is crucial for genetic counseling in families. This study included 28 samples from five SMA families, each with an affected patient carrying a homozygous deletion of the SMN1 gene and a parent suspected to be a SMN1 2 + 0 carrier. Comprehensive Analysis of SMA (CASMA), based on third-generation sequencing technology, was used to detect the SMN1 and SMN2 copy numbers in the samples, and SMN1 2 + 0 carriers were identified through SMN1 haplotypes in parent-child trios (CASMA-trio). The results were compared with those obtained using Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) combined with Short Tandem Repeat (STR) linkage analysis. The SMN1 and SMN2 copy numbers detected by MLPA and CASMA were concordant across 25 peripheral blood samples, whereas CASMA failed to accurately determine the copy numbers in the remaining 3 amniotic fluid samples. CASMA-trio identified 5 members from 4 families as SMN1 2 + 0 carriers, which were consistent with the results from STR linkage analysis. However, the two methods yielded inconsistent results for the proband's father in one family. These findings suggest that CASMA has the potential to detect SMN1 and SMN2 copy numbers. Compared to STR linkage analysis, CASMA-trio only requires a parent-child trio to analyze SMN1 2 + 0 carriers, demonstrating a broader application prospect. Implementing CASMA-trio can facilitate comprehensive screening for SMA carriers.

Indexed as

Genetic LinkageHeterozygoteHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrosatellite RepeatsMuscular Atrophy, SpinalSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 ProteinSurvival of Motor Neuron 2 ProteinFemaleHaplotypesHumansMalePedigreeSMN1 protein, humanSMN2 protein, humanSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 ProteinSurvival of Motor Neuron 2 ProteinSMN1 2 + 0 carrierSpinal muscular atrophySTR linkage analysisThird-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39984716
PMCPMC11845760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.