Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39984651›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A digital twin based forecasting framework for power flow management in DC microgrids.

Kerry Sado, Jarrett Peskar, Austin Downey, Jamil Khan, Kristen Booth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kerry SadoDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. ksado@email.sc.edu.
Jarrett PeskarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Austin DowneyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Jamil KhanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Kristen BoothDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

Funding

Office of Naval Research N00014-22-C-1003 and N00014-23-C-1012.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to forecast system conditions is integral to the definition and functionality of digital twins. While forecasting methods have been explored for use in digital twin systems, the integration of feedback mechanisms for real-time forecasting and in-situ decision-making in DC microgrids has not been extensively investigated. This research develops a modular forecasting framework tailored for digital twins in DC microgrids to enable real-time monitoring, online forecasting, and decision-making. DC microgrids, characterized by dynamic load variations, benefit from advanced predictive capabilities to maintain stability and operational efficiency. The proposed digital twin-based forecasting framework addresses these challenges by providing real-time predictive insights based on dynamic system conditions and a forecasting window defined by a decision-maker, facilitating proactive management strategies. Leveraging real-time sensor data, the digital twin forecasts system behavior under varying load conditions, enabling proactive management through real-time decision-making within operational constraints. As a proof of concept, the framework incorporates an electro-thermal digital twin designed to manage power flow based on thermal constraints in power distribution cables. Experimental validation using a simplified three-bus DC microgrid testbed demonstrates the effectiveness of the framework in enabling timely adjustments to power flows and preventing thermal overloads.

Indexed as

Decision-makingDigital twinElectric shipsForecastingPower systems

Identifiers

PMID39984651
PMCPMC11845680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.