ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring the determinants of mathematics teachers' willingness to implement STEAM education using structural equation modeling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attention and social problems are uniquely associated with academic achievement beyond overall psychopathology: multicohort replication in 3,800 participants.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026Article
- A transformer based approach to STEAM integrated english course design in high schools under deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the use of double-speed video playback in a fast-paced society through structural equation modeling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Psychological insight into corruption: construction and validation of the Corrupt Intention Scale (CIS).Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) has gained increasing attention for its potential to enhance student learning experiences, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. However, implementing STEAM in mathematics education presents numerous challenges. This study examines the factors that influence mathematics teachers' willingness to adopt STEAM by integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with an innovative component STEAM literacy. Utilizing questionnaire data from 1,173 mathematics teachers across China and employing Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), our analysis highlights the critical roles of perceived usefulness and subjective norm in motivating teachers' intentions to engage with STEAM. Furthermore, we find that these intentions significantly predict actual implementation. Notably, the inclusion of STEAM literacy within the TPB-TAM framework offers a unique perspective, demonstrating that enhancing STEAM literacy, alongside fostering positive attitudes and providing adequate resources, can significantly influence both the intention and the practical adoption of STEAM education. This study delivers valuable insights for educational policymakers and practitioners on promoting STEAM effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.