Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39984607›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cortical parcellation optimized for magnetoencephalography with a clustering technique.

Sara Sommariva, Narayan Puthanmadam Subramaniyam, Lauri Parkkonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara SommarivaDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland. sara.sommariva@unige.it.
Narayan Puthanmadam SubramaniyamDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.
Lauri ParkkonenDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.

Funding

Ministero della Salute Progetto DHEAL-COM - CUP: D33C22001980001Research Council of Finland #289108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A typical approach to estimate connectivity from magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data consists of 1) computing a cortically-constrained, distributed source estimate, 2) dividing the cortex into parcels according to an anatomical atlas, 3) combining the source time courses within each parcel, and 4) computing a connectivity metric between these combined time courses. However, combining MEG signals to spatial mean activities of anatomically-defined parcels often leads to cancellation within and crosstalk between parcels. We present a method that divides the cortex into parcels whose activity can be faithfully represented by a single dipolar source while minimizing inter-parcel crosstalk. The method relies on unsupervised clustering of the MEG leadfields, also accounting for distances between the cortically-constrained sources to promote spatially contiguous parcels. The cluster each source point belongs to is determined by its k nearest-neighbour memberships. Inter-parcel crosstalk was minimized by assigning [Formula: see text] and a weight of 20%-40% to the spatial distances, leading to 60-120 parcels. Our approach, available through the Python package "megicparc", enables a compact yet anatomically-informed source-level representation of MEG data with a similar dimensionality as in the original sensor-level data. Such representation should enable significant improvements in source-space visualization of MEG features or in estimating functional connectivity.

Indexed as

Brain MappingCerebral CortexMagnetoencephalographyAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID39984607
PMCPMC11845507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.