ArticleScientific reports2025
Selection and validation of reference genes in alfalfa based on transcriptome sequence data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Screening of Reference Gene for RT-qPCR inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Identification and validation of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR in Corydalis saxicola under various abiotic stresses.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Exploring the influence of nanosilica on monoterpene biosynthesis, PAL1 and LS gene expression in cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) under water-deficit stress.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Screening and Identification of Reference Genes forInsects · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Compared with the traditional gene expression techniques of quantitative analysis, RT-qPCR is most widely used because of its low cost, time-saving, and accuracy. It is essential to introduce suitable internal reference genes as reference corrections in RT-qPCR experiments to reduce the RNA quality and reverse transcription efficiency of different samples. In our study, we chose the candidate internal reference genes of alfalfa from transcriptome sequence datasets (162 RNA-seq sequencing data) through comparative analysis. Finally, 10 candidate reference genes were selected. These candidate reference gene expressions were determined by RT-qPCR under five abiotic stresses of drought, alkali, high temperature, low temperature, and acid treatments. The stability index of these candidate genes was calculated and evaluated correspondently using specific software and different lgorithms, such as GeNorm, Normfinder, Bestkeeper, ΔCt method, and an online analysis tool RefFinder. Then the appropriate candidate genes were screened strictly; and validated by the phyA gene. GAPDH and Actin are taken as traditional reference genes on gene expression of quantitative analysis commonly used in alfalfa, Our results showed GAPDH and Actin aren't the most appropriate reference genes of alfalfa under different abiotic stresses, under alkaline stress, the optimal reference gene is UBL-2a, and the optimal combination of reference genes is MS.65,463 (some candidate reference genes haven't been annotated yet, using gene ID abbreviation number of Medicago sativa L. instead )and UBL-2a; Under drought stress, the optimal reference gene is Ms.33,066, and the optimal combination of reference genes is MS.65,463 and UBL-2a; Under high-temperature stress, the optimal reference gene is Actin, and the optimal combination of reference genes is Rer1, Actin, MS.00617, MS.74,923, UBL-2a, MS.33,066, MS.99,505, and MS.65,463; Under low-temperature stress, the optimal reference gene is Actin, and the optimal combination of reference genes is Rer1, Actin, MS.99,505, MS.073307, and UBL-2a. The optimal reference genes and their combinations need further validation under acid stress. This paper provides scientific evidence for quantitative analysis of the genes of alfalfa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.