Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39984580›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Gibbsian surface thermodynamic analysis of emulsion liquid membranes.

Shaghayegh Sadeghi, Leila Zargarzadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shaghayegh SadeghiFaculty of Chemical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran.
Leila ZargarzadehFaculty of Chemical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran. zargarzadeh@aut.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emulsion liquid membrane is a promising technique for separating pollutants such as metals, weak acids and bases, mineral species, hydrocarbons, and biological substances. The popularity of the membrane process is due to its high mass transfer efficiency, process simplicity, and low energy consumption. Despite significant advancements in the field of emulsion liquid membranes, the effect of the interfacial curvature on component distribution remains largely uninvestigated. In the present study, considering the emulsion liquid membrane where no reaction takes place, the thermodynamic equilibrium relationships are calculated while considering the effect of interfacial curvature between the phases. The Gibbsian surface thermodynamic method is employed to derive the equations at equilibrium for the composite system of emulsion liquid membrane. With the obtained equations, the mole fraction and percentage extraction of the desired substance can be calculated under various conditions, such as different surfactant concentration, and droplet size, as well as assuming ideal or non-ideal condition for the solution. The results indicate that by reducing the size of internal droplets to the nanoscale, the effect of interfacial curvature becomes significant, and the extraction percentage gets higher.

Indexed as

Double emulsionEmulsion liquid membraneGibbsian composite-system thermodynamicsInterfacial curvatureMultiphase multicomponent system

Identifiers

PMID39984580
PMCPMC11845515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.