ArticleScientific reports2025
Behavioral (reaction time) and prefrontal cortex response revealed differences in grief vs. sadness perception.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurophysiological and Cognitive Effects of Transcendental Meditation: Evidence from EEG Biomarkers and Reaction Time.Annals of neurosciences · 2026Article
- Short-term high-altitude exposure protects working memory by balancing intestinal microbiota.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Mapping EEG Metrics to Human Affective and Cognitive Models: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Biophilic Design and Restorative Effects: A Neuropsychological Study of Healthy Indoor Workspaces in Urban Contexts.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on basic emotions has expanded beyond the traditional six categories, identifying over 20 distinct emotional states. However, differentiating some emotions remained challenging due to partially overlapping facial expressions. Grief and sadness are two such emotions that are difficult to distinguish. This study investigated the behavioral and neural mechanisms of grief perception in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), comparing it with sadness. Participants categorized and rated emotional facial images in grief and sadness conditions on valence, arousal, and dominance scales. While participants perceiving emotional facial images prefrontal cortex (PFC) hemodynamic activities were measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Explicit behavioral responses showed no significant differences, however implicit measures (reaction times) revealed distinctions between grief and sadness perception. Further fNIRS results indicated increased oxy-Hb in the right dorsolateral PFC for grief condition images compared to sadness condition images. Additionally, cultural differences were observed, with Asian participants showing higher oxy-Hb responses in the dorsal PFC for unpleasant facial stimuli in grief conditions. These findings support cultural variability in emotion perception and regulation. The combination of behavioral reaction time and neuroimaging data suggests distinct implicit perceptual and neural processing mechanisms for grief and sadness. This indicates separate automatic implicit mechanisms for these emotions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.