ArticleScientific reports2025
Model predicted human mobility explains COVID-19 transmission in urban space without behavioral data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Spatio-Temporal COVID-19 Modeling: A Global Systematic Review of Data Integration, Equity, and Lessons for Pandemic Preparedness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic prediction of spatiotemporal transmission of potential respiratory pandemics in China.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2026Article
- Inference of latent epidemic regimes and generative simulations reveal how inequality and mobility shape COVID-19 transmission.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Remarks on a Scaling Theory of Spread of COVID-19 with an Application to the Case of Bulgaria.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Topological analysis of COVID-19 wave patterns and policy responses in Europe.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 virus is primarily transmitted through in-person interactions, and so its growth in urban space is a complex function of human mobility behaviors that cannot be adequately explained by standard epidemiological models. Recent studies leveraged fine-grained urban mobility data to accurately model the viral spread, but such data pose privacy concerns and are often difficult to collect, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Here, we show that the metapopulation epidemiological model incorporated with a simple gravity mobility model can be sufficient to capture most of the complex epidemic dynamics in urban space, largely reducing the need for empirical mobility data. Extensive experiments on 30 cities in the United States, India and Brazil show that our model consistently reproduces complex, distinctive COVID-19 growth curves with high accuracy. It also provides a theoretical explanation of the emergence of urban "superspreading", where a few high-risk neighborhoods account for most subsequent infections. Furthermore, with the aid of the proposed framework, we can inform mobility-aware travel restrictions to achieve a better balance between social cost and disease prevention, which facilitates sustainable epidemic control and supports the gradual transition to a post-pandemic world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.