Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39984503›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Influence of behavior of a coupled dynamic system on an energy harvester.

Asmaa Amer, W Zhang, T S Amer, H Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Asmaa AmerDepartment of Mechanics, GuangXi University, GuangXi, 530004, P. R. China.
W ZhangDepartment of Mechanics, GuangXi University, GuangXi, 530004, P. R. China. sandyzhang9@163.com.
T S AmerMathematics Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta, 31527, Egypt.
H LiSchool of Mathematics, Statistics and Mechanics, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines the behavior of a two-degrees-of-freedom (2DOF) kinematic system of the spring pendulum coupled to a harvester. The harvester is the electromagnetic device that is reliant on a magnet's oscillation within a coil. Using the Lagrangian, the governing equations of motion (GEOM) are generated. The multiple-time-scales approach (MTSA) is employed to provide the analytical solutions (AS) for these equations up the third-order of approximations. To ascertain these solutions, we juxtapose them with numerical ones. The modulation equations are set up, and the principal external resonance instances are investigated concurrently upon the solvability constraints. A schematic representation of the dynamical system's behavior is provided by the time histories, phase portraits, and nonlinear stability analysis of the modulation equations. Moreover, the time histories of the electromagnetic harvester's current, power, and voltage are shown to illustrate how various parameters impact the generation of electrical energy. According to the Routh-Hurwitz stability criteria (RHSC), stability/instability regions exist wherein the behavior of the examined system is stable over a large range of applied parameters. In addition, stable/unstable fixed points within the scenario of steady-state are distinguished. This work's relevance is confined to the practical implementations of its findings in daily life, including energy sources for the industrial, electronic and medical devices.

Indexed as

Electromagnetic deviceEnergy harvestingFixed pointsMultiple-scales approachNonlinear dynamicsStability/instability zonesVibrating systems

Identifiers

PMID39984503
PMCPMC11845492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.