Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39984497›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Framework for investigating structure cracking using real engineering data combined with physics constraints.

Han Si, Qidi Wang, Xin Ruan, Xingpo Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Han Si *Department of Bridge Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Qidi Wang *Department of Bridge Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Xin RuanDepartment of Bridge Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai, 200092, China. ruanxin@tongji.edu.cn.
Xingpo FangGanzhou Construction Engineering Group, 13 Changgang Rd, Ganzhou City, 341000, Jiangxi, China.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2024M752416Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2022-5-5YB-12National Natural Science Foundation of China 51678435Shanghai Pujiang Program 23PJ1413300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate description of the condition of engineering structures is important for ensuring structural safety. Traditional analysis methods based on simplified physical mechanisms cannot accurately characterize the structural condition and neglect the value of the large amount of data generated during the construction process. This paper proposes a data-driven analysis framework that combines physical principles, dimensionality reduction techniques and ensemble learning models to trace back the deep-seated connections between data, achieving multi-factor analysis of structural defects. Using concrete structural cracks in a certain project as an example, the framework considers full life-cycle data, including material, environment, and construction processes, to construct an assessment model. The results show that by establishing a mapping relationship between construction data and structural condition, and integrating cumulative indicators from different construction stages, a reference for describing the structural safety condition can be provided to some extent, along with optimization suggestions, offering an analytical perspective for solving complex structural problems in engineering.

Indexed as

Concrete crackingData-driven analysisDefect assessmentEnsemble learning modelsPhysics-constrained data

Identifiers

PMID39984497
PMCPMC11845576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.