Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39984195›Full record

ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2025

Large-scale study of human memory for meaningful narratives.

Antonios Georgiou, Tankut Can, Mikhail Katkov, Misha Tsodyks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antonios Georgiou *School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3962-5836
Tankut Can *Department of Physics, Emory University, Atlanta 30322, Georgia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0999-2355
Mikhail KatkovSchool of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9532-8484
Misha TsodyksSchool of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA mtsodyks@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5661-4349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The statistical study of human memory requires large-scale experiments, involving many stimulus conditions and test subjects. While this approach has proven to be quite fruitful for meaningless material such as random lists of words, naturalistic stimuli, like narratives, have until now resisted such a large-scale study, due to the quantity of manual labor required to design and analyze such experiments. In this work, we develop a pipeline that uses large language models (LLMs) both to design naturalistic narrative stimuli for large-scale recall and recognition memory experiments, as well as to analyze the results. We performed online memory experiments with a large number of participants and collected recognition and recall data for narratives of different sizes. We found that both recall and recognition performance scale linearly with narrative length; however, for longer narratives, people tend to summarize the content rather than recalling precise details. To investigate the role of narrative comprehension in memory, we repeated these experiments using scrambled versions of the narratives. Although recall performance declined significantly, recognition remained largely unaffected. Recalls in this condition seem to follow the original narrative order rather than the actual scrambled presentation, pointing to a contextual reconstruction of the story in memory. Finally, using LLM text embeddings, we construct a simple measure for each clause based on semantic similarity to the whole narrative, that shows a strong correlation with recall probability. Overall, our work demonstrates the power of LLMs in accessing new regimes in the study of human memory, as well as suggesting novel psychologically informed benchmarks for LLM performance.

Indexed as

ComprehensionMemoryMental RecallNarrationRecognition, PsychologyAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39984195
PMCPMC11852912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.