ReviewExperimental eye research2025
Dissecting the biological complexity of age-related macular degeneration: Is it one disease, multiple separate diseases, or a spectrum?
Review in Experimental eye research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting retinal and macular degeneration in the genomics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Systematic Analysis of Plasma-Derived Extracellular Vesicle-Enriched Samples in Age-Related Macular Degeneration Reveals Oxidative Stress Linked to Altered Lipid and Protein Profiles.Journal of extracellular biology · 2026Article
- Tomographic phenotypes and conditional time to atrophic conversion in dry age-related macular degeneration among progressors: an interval-censored study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Complement-Modulating Mechanisms of Ginkgo biloba Extract in Dry AMD: Insights From Molecular Docking and Dynamics Simulations.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Human retinal organoid model of disease-relevant photoreceptor cell death amenable to drug screening.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinicians recognize the heterogeneity of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in presentation, progression, and treatment response, as well as the challenges in distinguishing it from other macular degenerations. As part of the 2024 Ryan Initiative for Macular Research meeting, a group of clinician-scientists and basic scientists were convened to consider the question of whether AMD should be classified as a single disorder or a spectrum of conditions. To answer this question, we reviewed research on several "dimensions" that constitute AMD risk or pathogenesis: genetics, ancestry, retinal imaging findings, diet and environment, aging, and outer retinal molecular and cellular pathways. The group reached a consensus that AMD represents a heterogeneous collection of disease states arising from the interplay of these dimensions. This heterogeneity can be conceived of as a "cloud" of AMD phenotypes. Defining subtypes within this "cloud" requires longitudinal cohorts of well-genotyped and phenotyped patients who progress from no AMD through late AMD, analyzed by unsupervised learning. Comparing the AMD subtypes that emerge from this analysis, especially -omics data from each subtype, will illuminate biology that is applicable to certain subtypes of AMD patients and molecular pathogenic mechanisms that universally apply to all AMD. This knowledge will, in turn, drive improved drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.