ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2025
Detection of Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia Using Artificial Intelligence With Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology Imaging: Approximation to Ocular Histopathology.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026Review
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Ocular Surface Tumors: Current Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Utilizing artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of ocular surface squamous neoplasia with ultrasound biomicroscopy images.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Diagnostic Guidance in Ocular Surface Disorders.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Enhanced Imaging of Ocular Surface Lesions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model to differentiate ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) from pterygium and pinguecula using high-resolution anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).
designRetrospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study.
methodsSetting: Single-center. STUDY POPULATION: All eyes with a clinical or biopsy-proven diagnosis of OSSN, pterygium, or pinguecula that received AS-OCT imaging. PROCEDURES: Imaging data was extracted from Optovue AS-OCT (Fremont, CA) and patients' clinical or biopsy-proven diagnoses were collected from electronic medical records. A DL classification model was developed using two methodologies: (1) a masked autoencoder was trained with unlabeled data from 105,859 AS-OCT images of 5746 eyes and (2) a Vision Transformer supervised model coupled to the autoencoder used labeled data for fine-tuning a binary classifier (OSSN vs non-OSSN lesions). A sample of 2022 AS-OCT images from 523 eyes (427 patients) were classified by expert graders into "OSSN or suspicious for OSSN" and "pterygium or pinguecula." The algorithm's diagnostic performance was evaluated in a separate test sample using 566 scans (62 eyes, 48 patients) with biopsy-proven OSSN and compared with expert clinicians who were masked to the diagnosis. Analysis was conducted at the scan-level for both the DL model and expert clinicians, who were not provided with clinical images or supporting clinical data. MAIN OUTCOME: Diagnostic performance of expert clinicians and the DL model in identifying OSSN on AS-OCT scans.
resultsThe DL model had an accuracy of 90.3% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 87.5%-92.6%), with sensitivity of 86.4% (95% CI: 81.4%-90.4%) and specificity of 93.2% (95% CI: 89.9%-95.7%) compared to the biopsy-proven diagnosis. Expert graders had a lower sensitivity 69.8% (95% CI: 63.6%-75.5%) and slightly higher specificity 98.5% (95% CI: 96.4%-99.5%) than the DL model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the DL model was 0.945 (95% CI: 0.918-0.972) and significantly greater than expert graders (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.688, P < .001).
conclusionsA DL model applied to AS-OCT scans demonstrated high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in differentiating OSSN from pterygium and pinguecula. Interestingly, the model had comparable diagnostic performance to expert clinicians in this study and shows promise for enhancing clinical decision-making. Further research is warranted to explore the integration of this artificial intelligence-driven approach in routine screening and diagnostic protocols for OSSN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.