Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39983637›Full record

ArticleBrain and language2025

Differential effects of working memory constraints on syntactic and semantic processing: Evidence from ERPs.

Megan Nakamura, Eleonora Rossi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and language, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Megan NakamuraDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, Stage College, PA 16802, USA. Electronic address: mjn5892@psu.edu.
Eleonora RossiDepartment of Linguistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Funding

Psychosocial Determinants and Biological Pathway to Healthy Aging (Pathways)T32AG049676 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI LYNN M. MARTIRE · 2016 to 2026
$3.9M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG049676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory (WM) is essential for language comprehension. It enables us to retain and manipulate information, track context, and recall key details. While WM's role in syntactic processing is well-established, its impact on semantic processing is less clear.WM resources are allocated based on task demands, with syntactic processing-requiring the maintenance and manipulation of hierarchical dependencies-placing higher demands on WM. The present study uses electroencephalography (EEG) to examine how WM constraints impact syntactic and semantic processing. Monolingual English speakers completed a Sentence Judgment Task (SJT). Participants were assigned to two groups: the NonMemory group completed the SJT alone, while the Memory group performed a dual-task version requiring them to memorize a sequence of three words and monitor the sentences for these words. Event-related potential (ERP) results reveal a diminished P600 effect for syntactic violations in the Memory group, suggesting reduced sensitivity to syntactic errors under WM constraints. In contrast, no significant group differences for the N400 were observed for semantic violations, indicating that semantic processing may be less affected by WM limitations. This study advances our understanding of the role of WM in language processing and highlights how WM constraints differentially impact syntactic vs semantic processing. Insights from this research can inform how the brain adapts to varying WM demands, such as in second language processing, where prioritizing semantic over syntactic processing may be necessary to optimize limited cognitive resources.

Indexed as

BrainComprehensionEvoked PotentialsMemory, Short-TermSemanticsAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansLanguageMaleYoung AdultERPsSemantic processingSentence processingSyntactic processingWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID39983637
PMCPMC11993935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.