ArticleBiophysical chemistry
Unbiased clustering of residues undergoing synchronous motions in proteins using NMR spin relaxation data.
Article in Biophysical chemistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An MD View of Ligand Binding.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Allosteric binding cooperativity in kinases signaling, signalopathies, and drug development.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biological macromolecules are dynamic entities that transition between various conformational states, often playing a vital role in biological functions. Their inherent flexibility spans a broad range of timescales. Motions occurring within the microsecond to millisecond range are especially important, as they are integral to processes such as enzyme catalysis, folding, ligand binding, and allostery. NMR Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) relaxation dispersion measurements are the preferred method for characterizing macromolecular motions at atomic resolution. However, it is still uncertain whether the functional motions of multiple residues in macromolecules need to be coordinated and/or synchronized within the protein matrix in order to perform the desired function. Here, we illustrate an unbiased method to analyze NMR relaxation dispersion and identify dynamic clusters of residues that fluctuate on similar timescales within proteins. The method requires relaxation dispersion data for backbone amides or side-chain methyl groups, which are globally fitted using the Bloch-McConnell equations for each pair of residues. The goodness of the pairwise fitting serves as a metric to construct two-dimensional synchronous dynamics (SyncDyn) maps, allowing us to identify residue clusters whose dynamics are influenced by ligand binding. We applied our method to the catalytic subunit of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKAC) and the T17A mutant of ribonuclease A (RNAse A). The SyncDyn maps for PKA-C showed distinct clusters of residues located in critical allosteric sites. Nucleotide binding activates the movement of residues at the interface between the two lobes and also those distal to the active site. In the case of RNAse A, the SyncDyn maps show that residues fluctuating with the same time scale are interspersed in both lobes of the enzyme. Overall, our approach eliminates arbitrary manual selection of residues for dynamic clustering and objectively identifies all possible residue pairs that fluctuate synchronously, i.e. on the same timescale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.