ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025
Validation of a Digital Pathology-Based Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Biomarker in a Prospective, Real-World Prostate Cancer Cohort Treated with Prostatectomy.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Clinical Trials for Central Nervous System Injuries.Current neuropharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Present status of prostate cancer diagnosis, limitations, challenges, and future endeavors.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- SARIFA and Lipid Metabolic Reprogramming in Prostate Cancer: Fundamental Mechanisms, Tumor Microenvironment, and Novel Biomarker Prospects.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- AI-driven model for early failure prediction after HIFU integrating immediate post-ablation ultrasound and clinical data.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning in Biomarker-Driven Precision Oncology: Automated Immunohistochemistry Scoring and Emerging Directions in Genitourinary Cancers.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Multimodal artificial intelligence in urologic precision oncology: from algorithm to translational medicine (a systemized narrative review).Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Multi-modal integration of histopathology and transcriptomics reveals STAB1Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven pathomics in hepatocellular carcinoma: current developments, challenges and perspectives.Discover oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeA multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI) biomarker was developed using clinical trial data from North American men with localized prostate cancer treated with definitive radiation, using biopsy digital pathology images and key clinical information (age, PSA, and T-stage) to generate prognostic scores. This study externally validates the biomarker in a prospective, real-world dataset of men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer at a tertiary referral center in Sweden. EXPERIMENTAL
designAssociation between the MMAI scores (continuous and categorical) and endpoints of interest was assessed with Fine-Gray and cumulative incidence analyses for biochemical recurrence (BCR) and logistic regression for adverse pathology (AP) at RP.
resultsThe analysis included 143 patients with evaluable biopsy pathology images and complete clinical data to generate MMAI scores. The median follow-up was 8.8 years. At diagnosis, the median PSA was 7.5 ng/mL, the median age was 64 years, 29% had a Gleason grade group ≥3, and 88 men were evaluable for AP at RP. MMAI was significantly associated with BCR [subdistribution HR, 2.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.77-3.38; P < 0.001] and AP at RP (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 2.54-10.78; P < 0.001). Estimated 5-year BCR rates for MMAI intermediate to high versus low were 25% (95% CI, 16%-36%) versus 4% (95% CI, 1%-11%), respectively.
conclusionsThe MMAI biomarker, previously shown to be prognostic for distant metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality in men receiving definitive radiation, was prognostic for post-RP endpoints: BCR and AP. This biomarker validation study further supports the use of MMAI biomarkers in men with prostate cancer outside North America and those treated with RP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.