Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39983011›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025

Validation of a Digital Pathology-Based Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Biomarker in a Prospective, Real-World Prostate Cancer Cohort Treated with Prostatectomy.

Anders Bjartell, Agnieszka Krzyzanowska, Vinnie Y T Liu, Meghan Tierney, Trevor J Royce, Martin Sjöström, Marisol Macarena Palominos-Rivera, Emmalyn Chen, Alexandra Kraft, Andre Esteva and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anders BjartellDepartment of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5761-3786
Agnieszka KrzyzanowskaDepartment of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1288-7054
Vinnie Y T LiuArtera Inc., Los Altos, California.ORCID 0000-0002-7152-6830
Meghan TierneyArtera Inc., Los Altos, California.ORCID 0000-0003-4918-2370
Trevor J RoyceArtera Inc., Los Altos, California.ORCID 0000-0001-9879-1290
Martin SjöströmDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2629-9966
Marisol Macarena Palominos-RiveraDepartment of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0008-2289-8946
Emmalyn ChenArtera Inc., Los Altos, California.ORCID 0000-0002-4179-5773
Alexandra KraftArtera Inc., Los Altos, California.ORCID 0000-0001-8020-0712
Andre EstevaArtera Inc., Los Altos, California.ORCID 0000-0003-1937-9682
Felix Y FengUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-0963-7687

Funding

Cancerfonden (Swedish Cancer Society) #2018/522 and #2021/1629Medicinska Fakulteten, Lunds Universitet (Faculty of Medicine, Lund University) 2018/810 and 2022/0105Vetenskapsrådet (VR) #2020-02017 and 2023-02671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI) biomarker was developed using clinical trial data from North American men with localized prostate cancer treated with definitive radiation, using biopsy digital pathology images and key clinical information (age, PSA, and T-stage) to generate prognostic scores. This study externally validates the biomarker in a prospective, real-world dataset of men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer at a tertiary referral center in Sweden. EXPERIMENTAL

designAssociation between the MMAI scores (continuous and categorical) and endpoints of interest was assessed with Fine-Gray and cumulative incidence analyses for biochemical recurrence (BCR) and logistic regression for adverse pathology (AP) at RP.

resultsThe analysis included 143 patients with evaluable biopsy pathology images and complete clinical data to generate MMAI scores. The median follow-up was 8.8 years. At diagnosis, the median PSA was 7.5 ng/mL, the median age was 64 years, 29% had a Gleason grade group ≥3, and 88 men were evaluable for AP at RP. MMAI was significantly associated with BCR [subdistribution HR, 2.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.77-3.38; P < 0.001] and AP at RP (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 2.54-10.78; P < 0.001). Estimated 5-year BCR rates for MMAI intermediate to high versus low were 25% (95% CI, 16%-36%) versus 4% (95% CI, 1%-11%), respectively.

conclusionsThe MMAI biomarker, previously shown to be prognostic for distant metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality in men receiving definitive radiation, was prognostic for post-RP endpoints: BCR and AP. This biomarker validation study further supports the use of MMAI biomarkers in men with prostate cancer outside North America and those treated with RP.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBiomarkers, TumorProstatic NeoplasmsAgedBiopsyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProspective StudiesProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenBiomarkers, TumorProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID39983011
PMCPMC11995000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.