ArticlePloS one2025
Behind the mask: Random and selective masking in transformer models applied to specialized social science texts.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transformer models such as BERT and RoBERTa are increasingly popular in the social sciences to generate data through supervised text classification. These models can be further trained through Masked Language Modeling (MLM) to increase performance in specialized applications. MLM uses a default masking rate of 15 percent, and few works have investigated how different masking rates may affect performance. Importantly, there are no systematic tests on whether selectively masking certain words improves classifier accuracy. In this article, we further train a set of models to classify fake news around the coronavirus pandemic using 15, 25, 40, 60 and 80 percent random and selective masking. We find that a masking rate of 40 percent, both random and selective, improves within-category performance but has little impact on overall performance. This finding has important implications for scholars looking to build BERT and RoBERTa classifiers, especially those where one specific category is more relevant to their research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.