Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39982966›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The PRECISION study protocol: Can cervical stiffness in the second trimester predict preterm birth in high-risk singleton pregnancies? A feasibility, cohort study.

Elizabeth Medford, Steven Lane, Andrew Sharp, Angharad Care

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05837390 (Can Cervical Stiffness in the Second Trimester Predict Preterm Birth in High-Risk Singleton Pregnancies?), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05837390 completednot on this map

Can Cervical Stiffness in the Second Trimester Predict Preterm Birth in High-Risk Singleton Pregnancies?

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of LiverpoolRan2023 to 2025Enrolled55ConditionsPreterm BirthArmsCervical stiffness assessment, Cervical length measurement, Fetal fibronectin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth MedfordDepartment of Women and Children's Health, Harris Preterm Birth Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0009-4578-0446
Steven LaneUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Andrew SharpDepartment of Women and Children's Health, Harris Preterm Birth Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Angharad CareDepartment of Women and Children's Health, Harris Preterm Birth Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2131-0406

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm birth (PTB) is a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. More than 13 million babies are affected globally every year and PTB will contribute to over 900,000 deaths. In the UK, PTB affects 8% of pregnancies and costs more than £260 million annually in neonatal care. Identifying those at risk of this devastating complication of pregnancy and implementing preventative treatment remains a maternal health priority. The mainstay of PTB prevention has been assessment of cervical length (CL) in women at high-risk of PTB. However, CL has limitations, namely it is invasive, user dependent and varies over time through pregnancy. Importantly, not all those who are high-risk with a short CL will subsequently deliver preterm and CL screening doesn't identify a sub-set of women who have a spontaneous PTB without a short cervix. Therefore, existing care pathways for managing PTB can potentially benefit from additional assessments of risk. Novel ways of assessing cervical structure and function may improve our ability to predict spontaneous PTB and refine preventative intervention. This feasibility study will explore the use of a new antenatal test of cervical stiffness for assessing risk of spontaneous PTB in a high-risk singleton population.

methodsPRECISION is a single site prospective, feasibility, cohort study of asymptomatic women with singleton pregnancies at high risk for spontaneous PTB attending an inner-city tertiary maternity hospital in the UK. All study participants will be undergoing routine screening and management of PTB as per local guidance (NICE/Saving Babies Lives guidance) including CL screening with transvaginal ultrasound. Cervical stiffness will be assessed using the Pregnolia System; a novel, licensed, CE-marked, aspiration-based device. A measurement is obtained by applying the device directly to the anterior lip of the cervix, visualised via placement of a speculum, and gives a quantitative assessment of cervical stiffness represented as the Cervical Stiffness Index (CSI, in mbar). Participants will undergo cervical stiffness assessments at up to three timepoints in the second trimester between 14+0 weeks and 25+6 weeks gestation. The cervical stiffness index data will be paired with routine PTB clinic CL measurements taken at the same time points. The primary outcome will focus on the feasibility of using this novel antenatal test in this high-risk population and explore any association between cervical stiffness and PTB. DISCUSSION: This is an exploratory study to assess the use of this novel device in clinical practice. Direct comparison between cervical stiffness assessment using the Pregnolia System and CL assessment will determine the acceptability of this new assessment in this population, as well as explore its potential association with PTB. Our findings from this feasibility study will provide data on the potential of this novel device to impact PTB screening and evaluate acceptability of use in a high-risk population. Data on eligibility, recruitment rates and participant feedback will help inform future study design using the device.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05837390.

Indexed as

Cervix UteriPregnancy, High-RiskPregnancy Trimester, SecondPremature BirthAdultCervical Length MeasurementCohort StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansObservational Studies as TopicPregnancyProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID39982966
PMCPMC11844860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.