ArticlePloS one2025
Changes in pregnancy-related hormones, neuromechanical adaptations and clinical pain status throughout pregnancy: A prospective cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Pharmacological Interventions for the Treatment of Lumbopelvic Pain in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review Protocol Using the TIDieR Checklist.Musculoskeletal care · 2026Article
- The Anatomy of the Human Linea Alba: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Association between lumbopelvic pain in pregnancy and fear of childbirth: a multicenter cross-sectional case-control study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Unveiling the potential biochemical effects of selected heterocyclic compounds as human Type-A γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA A) Modulator: AnBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- What do we actually know about the biomechanics of pregnancy and labour? A systematic scoping review.PloS one · 2025Article
- Navigating Pregnancy Testing in Chronic Pain Management for Women of Reproductive Age.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During pregnancy, increased hormonal levels contribute to ligament laxity of the pelvis and could predispose to lumbopelvic pain. The main objective of this study was to assess changes in pregnancy-related hormones, neuromechanical adaptations and clinical pain status throughout pregnancy. An exploratory objective was to examine the possible association between those variables. Twenty-eight pregnant women participated in the study. At each trimester, they provided a blood sample (to measure relaxin, estrogen and progesterone), completed questionnaires assessing clinical status (functional disability, risk of poor prognosis of prolonged lumbar disability, avoidance behaviors, anxiety and pain catastrophizing), and were asked to perform a flexion-relaxation task (erector spinae electromyography and trunk kinematics). Results showed that throughout pregnancy, nocturnal and diurnal lumbopelvic pain intensity and related-disability, risk of poor lumbopelvic pain prognosis as well as avoidance behaviors increased, while pain catastrophizing decreased. Neuromechanical characteristics of flexion-relaxation task, including low back muscle activity and trunk kinematics, were similar across the three trimesters. Positive correlations were found between disability and estrogen levels (changes between first and second trimester, p = 0.05), and estrogen and diurnal lumbopelvic pain intensity (change between second and third trimester, p = 0.02). A positive correlation was also found between weight and the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire score (changes between second and third trimester, p = 0.05). Negative correlations were found between weight (change between first and second trimester) and lumbopelvic maximal angle (p = 0.003), FRP onset for pelvic (p = 0.04) and lumbopelvic (p = 0.003) angles as well as FRP cessation for lumbopelvic angle (p = 0.001). These results show that, in pregnant women, pain and disability are associated with hormonal changes rather than trunk neuromechanical characteristics during a flexion-relaxation task. These results suggest that the flexion-relaxation task may not be an appropriate proxy to study vertebral and pelvic muscle control in pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.