Observational studyPloS one2025
Compliance with smoke-free laws in hospitality venues in Ethiopia: A cross-sectional observational study in 10 cities.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe 2019 Ethiopia's comprehensive tobacco control proclamation mandates 100% smoke-free public places and workplaces. Despite the proclamation, compliance remains uncertain, particularly at hospitality venues (HVs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent of compliance with smoke-free laws in HVs and to also understand the factors associated with non-compliance.
methodsThis cross-sectional observational study was conducted in 10 cities in Ethiopia-Addis Ababa, Adama, Assosa, Bahir Dar, Dire Dawa, Gambella, Harar, Hawassa, Jigjiga, and Semera-Logia -between December 5th and 28th, 2022. Data were collected electronically using smartphones, utilizing a pre-tested, standardized checklist and covert observation. The subjects were selected through multi-stage cluster sampling. A total of 1,370 HVs (hotels, restaurants, bars, bars and restaurants, café and restaurants, butcher houses and restaurants, groceries, and nightclubs/ lounges) were observed. Specific and composite compliance indicators were computed for indoor and outdoor spaces. Poisson regression analyses identified factors associated with indoor active smoking and non-compliance. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.
resultsAmong the 1,370 HVs included in this study, 1,368 had indoor spaces, 327 had both indoor and outdoor spaces, and two had only outdoor spaces. Active smoking was observed in 32.2% (95% CI:30-35) of indoor HVs, with the highest rates in nightclubs/lounges (68.6%) and bars (65.7%). Semera-Logia reported the highest prevalence of active smoking (70.4%). Adherence with 'no smoking' signage was low (35.2%), while ashtrays, lighters, and designated smoking areas (DSAs) were rarely present. Outdoor active smoking was observed in 46.5% (95% CI:41-52) of HVs. Only 12.8% of indoor spaces were fully adherent to the smoke-free law requirements. Venues in Semera-Logia were over twice as likely to have active smoking (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR]: 2.71; 95% CI: 2.00-3.66) compared to Addis Ababa. Bars and nightclubs/lounges had significantly higher prevalence of active smoking than cafés/restaurants. 'No smoking' signs were associated with reduced prevalence of indoor active smoking (aPR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.67-0.89), while smoking within a 10-meter range (aPR: 2.67; 95% CI: 2.13-3.32), the presence of lighters (aPR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.41-2.02), and the sale of tobacco products (aPR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.34-1.86) were all associated with higher prevalence of indoor active smoking.
conclusionCompliance with 'no active smoking' and adherence to smoke-free laws in HVs remain low, particularly in bars, nightclubs/lounges, and Semera-Logia, with high rates of active smoking both indoors and outdoors. Enhanced enforcement and targeted are needed to educate the public and HV owners about the risks of SHS and the importance of tobacco control laws.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.