Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39982891›Full record

ReviewPloS one2025

Innovative approaches in QSPR modelling using topological indices for the development of cancer treatments.

Xiaolong Shi, Saeed Kosari, Masoud Ghods, Negar Kheirkhahan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaolong ShiInstitute of Computing Science and Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Saeed KosariInstitute of Computing Science and Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1427-5473
Masoud GhodsDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.
Negar KheirkhahanDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive review of quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR) about to cancer drugs, with a focus on the application of topological indices (TI) and data analysis techniques. Cancer is a serious and life-threatening disease for which no complete cure currently exists. Consequently, extensive research is ongoing to develop new therapeutic agents. The application of topological indices in chemistry and medicine, particularly in the investigation of the molecular, pharmacological, and therapeutic properties of drugs, has become a significant tool. This article investigates the potential of Temperature indices in analyzing the physicochemical properties of drugs used for cancer treatment. The approach employs QSPR modeling to establish correlations between the molecular structure of a compound and its physical and chemical properties. The analysis covers a range of Cancer drugs, including Aminopterin, Convolutamide A, Convolutamydine A, Daunorubicin, Minocycline, Podophyllotoxin, Caulibugulone E, Perfragilin A, Melatonin, Tambjamine K, Amathaspiramide E, and Aspidostomide E. The findings demonstrate that optimal regression models (Fifty-eight models) incorporating TI can effectively predict physicochemical properties, such as Boiling Point (BP), Enthalpy (EN), Flash Point (FP), Molar Refractivity (MR), Polar Surface Area (PSA), Surface Tension (ST), Molecular Volume (MV), and Complexity (COM). This research suggests that temperature-based topological indices (TI) are promising tools for the development and optimization of cancer drugs, as demonstrated by statistically significant results with a p-value less than 0.05. In addition to the linear regression model, which performed the best, two other machine learning models, namely SVR and Random Forest, were also used for further analysis and comparison of their performance in predicting the physicochemical properties of drugs, to assess the advantages and disadvantages of each model.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipHumansAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID39982891
PMCPMC11844895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.