Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39982864›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025

Accurate Lattice Free Energies of Packing Polymorphs from Probabilistic Generative Models.

Edgar Olehnovics, Yifei Michelle Liu, Nada Mehio, Ahmad Y Sheikh, Michael R Shirts, Matteo Salvalaglio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edgar OlehnovicsThomas Young Centre and Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, United Kingdom.
Yifei Michelle LiuMolecular Profiling and Drug Delivery, Research & Development, AbbVie Bioresearch Center, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, United States.
Nada MehioMolecular Profiling and Drug Delivery, Research & Development, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois 60064, United States.
Ahmad Y SheikhMolecular Profiling and Drug Delivery, Research & Development, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois 60064, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5972-3938
Michael R ShirtsUniversity of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3249-1097
Matteo SalvalaglioThomas Young Centre and Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3371-2090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Finite-temperature lattice free energy differences between polymorphs of molecular crystals are fundamental to understanding and predicting the relative stability relationships underpinning polymorphism, yet are computationally expensive to obtain. Here, we implement and critically assess machine-learning-enabled targeted free energy calculations derived from flow-based generative models to compute the free energy difference between two ice crystal polymorphs (Ice XI and Ic), modeled with a fully flexible empirical classical force field. We demonstrate that even when remapping from an analytical reference distribution, such methods enable a cost-effective and accurate calculation of free energy differences between disconnected metastable ensembles when trained on locally ergodic data sampled exclusively from the ensembles of interest. Unlike classical free energy perturbation methods, such as the Einstein crystal method, the targeted approach analyzed in this work requires no additional sampling of intermediate perturbed Hamiltonians, offering significant computational savings. To systematically assess the accuracy of the method, we monitored the convergence of free energy estimates during training by implementing an overfitting-aware weighted averaging strategy. By comparing our results with ground-truth free energy differences computed with the Einstein crystal method, we assess the accuracy and efficiency of two different model architectures, employing two different representations of the supercell degrees of freedom (Cartesian vs quaternion-based). We conduct our assessment by comparing free energy differences between crystal supercells of different sizes and temperatures and assessing the accuracy in extrapolating lattice free energies to the thermodynamic limit. While at low temperatures and in small system sizes, the models perform with similar accuracy. We note that for larger systems and high temperatures, the choice of representation is key to obtaining generalizable results of quality comparable to that obtained from the Einstein crystal method. We believe this work to be a stepping stone toward efficient free energy calculations in larger, more complex molecular crystals.

Identifiers

PMID39982864
PMCPMC11912200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.