Trial reportPloS one2025
Perceptions and experiences of young adults and their healthcare team of the D1 Now type 1 diabetes intervention.
Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundYoung adults (18-25 years) with type 1 diabetes can have high blood glucose levels, increasing their risk of complications. The D1 Now intervention aimed to improve outcomes, using a young adult-centred approach, comprising three components: an interactive messaging system, agenda setting tool, and support worker. A pilot randomised controlled trial was conducted to assess acceptability and feasibility of this novel intervention.
aimTo explore perceptions and experiences of young adults and healthcare staff participating in the intervention arms of the D1 Now pilot randomised controlled trial.
methodsA descriptive qualitative approach using semi structured interviews was used to collect data between May 2020, and January 2021 from sixteen young adults and ten healthcare staff Interviews were conducted online using MS Teams. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. A patient and public involvement approach was used with the D1 Now Young Adult Panel deployed from the outset to design and contribute to the study. Both written consent in advance and verbal consent was given by all participants for the online interviews that were video and audio recorded according to individual participant preference.
resultsThemes were developed separately for young adult and healthcare staff participants. Two themes were developed from the young adult data, 1) 'empowerment' and 2) 'perceptions and experiences of the intervention'. One theme was developed from the healthcare staff data, 'perceptions and experiences of delivering the intervention'. All participants highlighted that the agenda setting tool and the support worker empowered the young adults as they could focus the consultation process on what mattered most to them. However, the interactive messaging system was perceived as unsuitable by many mainly because the technology was outdated. Overall, the perceived impact of participating in the study was positive.
conclusionsUnderstanding participants perceptions and experiences of taking part in the D1 Now intervention is crucial. The lessons learnt can be used to further refine and develop the intervention with a view to measuring its effectiveness, in a future definitive trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.