ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Usage Trends and Data Sharing Practices of Healthcare Wearable Devices Among US Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advancing Remote Monitoring for Patients With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias: Systematic Review.JMIR aging · 2025Pooled it
- Willingness to Share Smartwatch-Generated Health Data Among a Sample of Adults in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Device and Data Access Considerations for Digital Health Studies Using Consumer-Grade Wearables: An Experience-Based Tutorial.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Increasing Use of Wearable Devices for Health or Activity Tracking Among Adults with Chronic Diseases in the US.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2026Article
- Wearable Devices and Data Sharing in the US.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Thyroid function tests and resting heart rate in Graves' disease: a prospective longitudinal study.Endocrine connections · 2026Article
- Smartphone-based digital phenotyping for detection of high-risk depression and anxiety in Korean community settings.Internet interventions · 2026Article
- Wearable Device Adoption, Physical Activity, and Health Data Sharing Among U.S. Cancer Survivors: Evidence from HINTS-7.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Sleep and Risk for Heart Disease and Stroke.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026Review
- Digital hypertension in 2024-2025: emerging evidence and future directions.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- Strengthening public health data governance: A Co-regulatory framework for integrating wearable health data into health systems.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Adolescents' experience of living with X-linked hypophosphataemia (XLH): a mixed-methods analysis of those who continued and discontinued burosumab treatment after end of skeletal growth.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Patient engagement with consumer wearable devices in the electronic health record.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Listening to Patients' Voices on the Use of AI in Health Care: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Using a Technology Acceptance Model to Explore the Intention to Use Digital Health Technologies Among People With Disabilities: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Wearable devices in neurological disorders: a narrative review of status quo and perspectives.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Factors Affecting Patients' Use of Telehealth Services: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and ECG: A New Frontier in Cardiac Diagnostics and Prevention.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Bridging UTAUT and HBM: determinants of wearable device adoption among chronic disease patients.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth care wearable devices can transform health care delivery by enabling real-time, continuous monitoring that facilitates early disease detection, personalized treatments, and improved patient engagement. The COVID-19 pandemic has heightened awareness of the importance of health technology, accelerating interest in wearables as tools for monitoring health and managing chronic conditions. As we navigate the postpandemic era, understanding the adoption and data-sharing behaviors associated with wearable devices has become increasingly critical. Despite their potential, challenges and low adoption rates persist, with significant gaps in understanding the impact of sociodemographic factors, health conditions, and digital literacy on the use and data-sharing behaviors of these devices.
objectiveThis study aimed to explore the usage and data-sharing practices (willingness to share wearable data and actual data-sharing behavior) of wearable devices among US adults specifically during the later phases of the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsUsing cross-sectional data from the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey 6, conducted from March to November 2022, this study uses responses from 5591 US adults to examine wearable use, willingness to share wearable data with providers, family, and friends, and the wearable data-sharing behavior.
resultsThe results indicate an increase in wearable device adoption to 36.36% (2033/5591) in 2022, up from 28%-30% in 2019. We also find a significant discrepancy between the willingness to share data, with 78.4% (1584/2020) of users open to sharing with health care providers, and the actual sharing behavior, where only 26.5% (535/ 2020) have done so. Higher odds of using wearables were associated with female gender (odds ratio [OR] 1.49, 95% CI 1.17-1.90, P<.01) and higher income levels (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.42-4.93, P<.01 for incomes between US $50,000 and US $75,000, and OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.71-5.97, P<.01 for incomes above US $75,000). However, the likelihood of usage and data sharing declines significantly with age. Compared with African American respondents, Hispanic respondents were more willing to share wearable data with providers (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.02-3.62, P<.05), though the odds of their actual sharing of wearable data with providers was relatively less (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.20-0.97, P<.05). Frequency of provider visits (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08-1.39, P<.01), and total medical conditions (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.05-1.73, P<.01) were significant predictors of data-sharing behavior. The study also identified weight, frequency of provider visits, technological self-efficacy and frequent physical activity as predictors for higher wearable use.
conclusionsInsights from this study are crucial for health care providers and policy makers aiming to leverage wearable technology to enhance health outcomes. Addressing the disparities and barriers identified can lead to more effective integration of these technologies in health care systems, thereby maximizing the potential of digital health tools to improve public health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.