Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39982729›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Algorithm-Based Palliative Care in Patients With Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ravi B Parikh, William J Ferrell, Yang Li, Jinbo Chen, Larry Bilbrey, Nicole Johnson, Jenna White, Ramy Sedhom, Natalie R Dickson, Stephen Schleicher and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05590962 (Predictive Analytics and Behavioral Nudges to Improve Palliative Care in Advanced Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05590962 nacompletednot on this map

Predictive Analytics and Behavioral Nudges to Improve Palliative Care in Advanced Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineRan2022 to 2023Enrolled562ConditionsCancerArmsEHR Nudge
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of the assessment model for palliative care needs in cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Palliative Care Integration in Oncology: A Review and Update.Journal of hospice and palliative care · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ravi B ParikhDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
William J FerrellDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Yang LiDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Jinbo ChenPenn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Larry BilbreyTennessee Oncology, Nashville.
Nicole JohnsonTennessee Oncology, Nashville.
Jenna WhiteDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Ramy SedhomPenn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Natalie R DicksonTennessee Oncology, Nashville.
Stephen SchleicherTennessee Oncology, Nashville.
Justin E BekelmanDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Sandhya MudumbiTennessee Oncology, Nashville.

Funding

Phenotypic Diversity in COVID-19UL1TR001878 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2016 to 2025
$102.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Among patients with advanced solid malignant tumors, early specialty palliative care (PC) is guideline recommended, but strategies to increase PC access and effectiveness in community oncology are lacking. Objective: To test whether algorithm-based defaults with opting out and accountable justification embedded in the electronic health record (EHR) increase completed PC visits. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 2-arm cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted from November 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. Eligible patients from 15 urban or rural clinics within a large community oncology network in Tennessee had advanced lung or noncolorectal gastrointestinal cancer and were identified by an automated EHR algorithm adapted from national guidelines. Data were analyzed between November 1, 2023, and March 4, 2024. Intervention: At sites randomized to control, clinicians received weekly reports detailing PC referral rates compared with peer clinicians (peer comparison) and referred patients to PC at their discretion. At sites randomized to intervention, clinicians also received default PC orders using the EHR. Clinicians who opted out of PC consultation were asked to provide justification (accountable justification). If clinicians did not opt out, a study coordinator contacted patients to introduce and schedule PC visits using a standardized, predefined script. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a completed PC consultation within 12 weeks of enrollment. Exploratory outcomes included quality of life, feeling heard and understood, and intensive end-of-life care. Outcomes were analyzed using clustered generalized linear and logistic regression models. Results: The trial enrolled 562 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.5 [10.1] years; 288 male [51.2%]), of whom 433 (77.0%) had lung cancer. There were 130 of 296 patients (43.9%) randomized to the intervention group and 22 of 266 (8.3%) randomized to the control group who completed PC visits (adjusted odds ratio, 8.9 [95% CI, 5.5-14.6]; P < .001). Among 179 patients who died at the 24-week follow-up, 6 of 92 (6.5%) in the intervention group compared with 14 of 87 (16.1%) in the control group received systemic therapy within 14 days of death (adjusted odds ratio, 0.3 [95% CI, 0.1-0.7]; P = .05). There were no differences in quality of life, feeling heard and understood, or late hospice referral. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of algorithm-based EHR defaults, the intervention increased PC consultations and decreased end-of-life systemic therapy. The intervention provides a scalable implementation strategy to increase specialty PC referrals in the community oncology setting. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05590962.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeoplasmsPalliative CareAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTennessee

Identifiers

PMID39982729
PMCPMC11846008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.