ArticleJAMA network open2025
Postoperative Weight Loss After Antiobesity Medications and Revision Risk After Joint Replacement.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- No Mid-Term Benefits of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists Following Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2026Pooled it
- Outcomes of Glucagon-Like-Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1A) and Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Iowa orthopaedic journal · 2026Pooled it
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perioperative and Postoperative Outcomes.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The 2023 American College of Rheumatology and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline concluded that obesity alone should not delay joint replacement. Therefore, a substantially increased utilization of joint replacement among patients with obesity could be expected. However, patients with obesity are at increased risk of revision, posing unique challenges as the surgery is complex and costly, and it remains unknown whether postoperative weight loss could decrease the risk of revision. Objective: To examine the association of the proportion of postoperative weight loss following antiobesity medication use with the risk of revision among patients with obesity undergoing hip or knee replacement. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using a target trial emulation, a causal inference framework, this retrospective cohort study investigated patients with obesity who underwent hip or knee replacement. Data were from the IQVIA Medical Research Database (2000-2023). Statistical analysis was performed from October 2023 to June 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Emulated analyses of a hypothetical target trial were assessed for the association of small-to-moderate (2%-10%) or large (≥10%) weight loss after initiating antiobesity medications (orlistat, sibutramine, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and rimonabant) within 1 year with the risk of 5-year and 10-year revision after initiation of antiobesity medications. Results: Among 3691 qualified participants (mean [SD] age, 64.7 [9.3] years; 2322 [62.9%] women), the 5-year risks of revision were 5.6%, 4.4%, and 3.7% for weight gain or stable, small-to-moderate weight loss, and large weight loss groups, respectively. Compared with the weight gain or stable group, the hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.55-1.04) for the small-to-moderate weight loss group and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.36-0.91) for the large weight loss group. Similar results were observed when the analyses were performed separately for hip or knee replacement. The HRs for revision were 0.55 (95% CI, 0.32-0.93) for small-to-moderate weight loss and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.25-0.97) for large weight loss groups compared with the weight gain or stable group in patients undergoing knee replacement; the corresponding HRs for revision were 0.82 (95% CI, 0.54-1.25) and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.30-0.93) in patients undergoing hip replacement. Consistent findings were obtained regarding the association of weight loss with the 10-year risks after initiating antiobesity medications. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study using a target trial emulation, a higher proportion of weight loss after initiating antiobesity medications within 1 year was associated with a lower risk of 5-year and 10-year revision among patients with obesity undergoing joint replacement. These results suggest that antiobesity medication use, with relatively safe and sustainable weight loss, may be an effective strategy for improving implant survivorship of hip and knee replacements in the obese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.