ArticleMolecular diversity2025
Explainable AI-driven prediction of APE1 inhibitors: enhancing cancer therapy with machine learning models and feature importance analysis.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced integrated SERS-based strategies for the early diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal cancers.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Machine Learning-Driven Discovery of Indole/Oxoindole-Piperazine Scaffolds as Dual MAO-B/Sig-1R Ligands for Neurodegenerative Disorders.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Orchestrated metal ion repositioning defines the dynamic catalytic strategy of the essential DNA repair nuclease APE1.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Integrating Blood-Based Immune-Inflammation Biomarkers into Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prognostic Models in Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The viability of cells and the integrity of the genome depend on the detection and repair of damaged DNA through intricate mechanisms. Cancer treatment employs chemotherapy or radiation therapy to eliminate neoplastic cells by causing substantial damage to their DNA. In many cases, improved DNA repair mechanisms lead to resistance to these medicines; therefore, it is essential to expand efforts to develop drugs that can sensitise cells to these treatments by inhibiting the DNA repair process. Multiple studies have demonstrated a correlation between the overexpression of Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease (APE1), the primary mammalian enzyme responsible for excising apurinic or apyrimidinic sites in DNA, and the resistance of cells to cancer therapies; in contrast, APE1 downregulation increases cellular susceptibility to DNA-damaging agents. Thus, the effectiveness of existing therapies can be improved by promoting the targeted sensitization of cancer cells while protecting healthy cells. The current study aims to employ explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to enhance the accuracy and reliability of machine learning models for the prediction of APE1 inhibitors. Various ML-based regression models are employed to predict the pIC50 value of different medicines. Bayesian optimization and the Permutation Feature Importance (PFI) approach are employed to determine the best hyperparameters of machine learning models and to discover the most significant features for recognizing drug candidates that target APE1 enzymes, respectively. To acquire comprehensive elucidations for the predictive models in our research, two XAI methodologies, namely SHAP and LIME, are used. The SHAP analysis reveals that the features 'C1SP2' and 'ASP-2' are essential in influencing the model's predictions. The SHAP values demonstrate variability for features such as 'maxHBint2' and 'GATS1s,' signifying that their impact is dependent on specific instances within the dataset. The LIME study corroborates these findings, demonstrating that 'C1SP2' and 'ASP-2' are the most significant positive contributors, whereas features like 'SHCHnX,' 'nHdCH2,' and 'GATS1s' result in a decrease in the predicted values. Due to the limited sample size of the APE1 dataset, direct training on this dataset posed challenges in model generalization and reliability. To overcome this limitation, the BACE-1 dataset is leveraged for model training, enabling the ML models to learn from a more extensive and diverse chemical space. Among the tested algorithms, XGBoost demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving R
Indexed as
Identifiers
39982681What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.