Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39982677›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2025

Foraging with your eyes: a novel task to study cognitive strategies involved in (visual) foraging behaviour.

Matthew Green, Vladislava Segen, Amanda Korstjens, Andrew Isaac Meso, Tessa Thomas, Jan M Wiener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew GreenDepartment of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Fern Barrow, Poole, BH12 5BB, UK. mgreen@bournemouth.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3328-8912
Vladislava SegenAging & Cognition Research Group, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Amanda KorstjensDepartment of Life & Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Fern Barrow, Poole, BH12 5BB, UK.
Andrew Isaac MesoNeuroimaging Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (Ioppn), De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Tessa ThomasDepartment of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Fern Barrow, Poole, BH12 5BB, UK.
Jan M WienerDepartment of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Fern Barrow, Poole, BH12 5BB, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study we introduce a new gaze-contingent visual foraging task in which participants searched through an environment by looking at trees displayed on a computer screen. If the looked-at tree contained a fruit item, the item became visible and was collected. In each trial, the participant's task was to forage for a defined number of fruit items. In two experiments, fruit items were either randomly distributed about the trees (dispersed condition) or organised in one large patch (patchy condition). In the second experiment, we addressed the role of memory for foraging by including a condition that did not require memorising which trees had already been visited by changing their appearance (tree fading). Foraging performance was superior in the patchy as compared to the dispersed condition and benefited from tree-fading. In addition, with further analyses on search behaviour, these results suggest (1) that participants were sensitive to the distribution of resources, (2) that they adapted their search/foraging strategy accordingly, and (3) that foraging behaviour is in line with predictions derived from foraging theories, specifically area-restricted search, developed for large scale spatial foraging. We therefore argue that the visual search task presented shares characteristics and cognitive mechanisms involved in successful large-scale search and foraging behaviour and can therefore be successfully employed to study these mechanisms.

Indexed as

AttentionCognitionVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultEye-trackingForagingResource distributionSearchVisual search

Identifiers

PMID39982677
PMCPMC12339620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.