Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39982617›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2025

Establishment of a 23S rRNA assay for Brucella and its application in evaluating bacterial growth status.

Hao Wang, Haoyan Yang, Jianghua Yang, Xiang Liu, Bin Xie, Man Xu, Haitong Wang, Yutong Zhao, Baoshan Liu, Zeliang Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hao WangKey Laboratory of Livestock Infectious Diseases in Northeast China, Ministry of Education, and Key Laboratory of Ruminant Infectious Disease Prevention and Control (East), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dong ling Road, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110866, P. R. China.
Haoyan YangKey Laboratory of Livestock Infectious Diseases in Northeast China, Ministry of Education, and Key Laboratory of Ruminant Infectious Disease Prevention and Control (East), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dong ling Road, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110866, P. R. China.
Jianghua YangKey Laboratory of Livestock Infectious Diseases in Northeast China, Ministry of Education, and Key Laboratory of Ruminant Infectious Disease Prevention and Control (East), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dong ling Road, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110866, P. R. China.
Xiang LiuKey Laboratory of Livestock Infectious Diseases in Northeast China, Ministry of Education, and Key Laboratory of Ruminant Infectious Disease Prevention and Control (East), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dong ling Road, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110866, P. R. China.
Bin XieKey Laboratory of Livestock Infectious Diseases in Northeast China, Ministry of Education, and Key Laboratory of Ruminant Infectious Disease Prevention and Control (East), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dong ling Road, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110866, P. R. China.
Man XuKey Laboratory of Livestock Infectious Diseases in Northeast China, Ministry of Education, and Key Laboratory of Ruminant Infectious Disease Prevention and Control (East), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dong ling Road, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110866, P. R. China.
Haitong WangKey Laboratory of Livestock Infectious Diseases in Northeast China, Ministry of Education, and Key Laboratory of Ruminant Infectious Disease Prevention and Control (East), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dong ling Road, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110866, P. R. China.
Yutong ZhaoKey Laboratory of Livestock Infectious Diseases in Northeast China, Ministry of Education, and Key Laboratory of Ruminant Infectious Disease Prevention and Control (East), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dong ling Road, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110866, P. R. China.
Baoshan LiuKey Laboratory of Livestock Infectious Diseases in Northeast China, Ministry of Education, and Key Laboratory of Ruminant Infectious Disease Prevention and Control (East), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dong ling Road, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110866, P. R. China. lbslgy@syau.edu.cn.
Zeliang ChenKey Laboratory of Livestock Infectious Diseases in Northeast China, Ministry of Education, and Key Laboratory of Ruminant Infectious Disease Prevention and Control (East), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dong ling Road, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110866, P. R. China. zeliangchen@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brucellosis presents notable diagnostic challenges, particularly during the chronic phase of infection, due to the typically low bacterial load in tissues, which may evade detection by conventional Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) methods. Traditional PCR techniques are susceptible to cross-reactions and can produce false-positive or false-negative results. Furthermore, bacteriological and serological tests have recognized limitations in sensitivity and specificity, potentially complicating accurate diagnosis. We developed a novel reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assay targeting Brucella species' highly abundant and conserved 23S rRNA gene to address these challenges. The 23S rRNA gene was selected as an optimal molecular target due to the approaches' number and genetic stability across Brucella strains. Primers were designed based on a conserved region (Sequence ID: NR_103168.2) to ensure broad applicability, and their specificity was verified through BLAST analysis. A key feature of the 23S-RT-qPCR method is incorporating a reverse transcription step to convert RNA into complementary DNA (cDNA), which may enhance detection sensitivity. Using the Brucella S2 vaccine strain as a template, experimental results indicated that the 23S-RT-qPCR method reduced cycle threshold (Ct) values by approximately 2-3 units (14.67-16.74) compared to conventional qPCR. Statistical analysis using a T-test showed that this reduction was significant (P < 0.05). The performance of the 23S-RT-qPCR method was further evaluated using clinical samples and compared with the IS711 detection method. The 23S-RT-qPCR method demonstrated a lower false-positive rate (2.6%) and false-negative rate (7.6%) compared to the IS711 method, which had a false-positive rate of 5.2% and a false-negative rate of 7.6%. These results suggest that the 23S-RT-qPCR method offers improved sensitivity and specificity, reducing false-positive and false-negative rates in clinical sample analysis. Overall, this method may provide a more reliable approach for diagnosing chronic brucellosis and could have broader applicability in detecting other bacterial pathogens.

Indexed as

BrucellaBrucellosisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 23SAnimalsCattleSensitivity and SpecificityRNA, Ribosomal, 23S23S rRNA23S-RT‒qPCRBrucellaGrowth statusSensitivity

Identifiers

PMID39982617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.