Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39982544›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2025

Utilising multiple discharge coding will improve identification of patients with giant cell arteritis: a retrospective analysis of a hospital discharge dataset.

Andrew Dermawan, Julia Murdoch, Jean Louis De Sousa, Andrew Taylor, Helen Keen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew DermawanDepartment of General Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia. andrew.dermawan@health.wa.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0172-7872
Julia MurdochDepartment of Rheumatology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9939-9239
Jean Louis De SousaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Andrew TaylorDepartment of Rheumatology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Helen KeenDepartment of Rheumatology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8469-2424

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine whether the discharge diagnosis codes used within tertiary hospitals accurately identified patients with Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA), as determined by expert opinion at 6 months. The study was performed across three major hospitals within Perth, Western Australia. Patients with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for GCA (M31.5 and M31.6) at discharge on first inpatient presentation were identified. Review of case notes, discharge summaries, letters, pathology, and imaging results were undertaken. The percentage of patients with an ICD code for GCA at initial discharge with confirmed GCA by expert opinion at 6 months (as the anchor diagnosis) was calculated. As validation of the anchor diagnosis, the percentage who fulfilled the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria was also calculated, the number of hospital discharges per patient with an ICD code for GCA was calculated, to determine if multiple discharges with an ICD code for GCA increased the specificity of the ICD coding. 93 out of 157 admissions with an ICD for GCA were identified as a first inpatient presentation. At 6 months follow up, 65.6%, 95 CI [55.0%, 75.1%] had confirmed GCA by expert opinion. 88.2%, 95 CI [79.8%, 93.9%] met the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria for GCA. The specificity of the ICD coding increased with increasing number of discharges- 67.4% with single episode, 80% with two episodes, and 100% with three or more episodes (p = 0.1373). Only 43.8%, 95 CI [26.4%, 62.3%] of patients who did not have GCA had an alternative diagnosis provided. 31.3%, 95 CI [16.1%, 50.0%] of patients who did not have GCA still have the GCA diagnosis listed in their subsequent clinical records and discharge summaries. Only 2/3rds of those patients with an initial discharge ICD code for GCA were found to have confirmed GCA at follow-up. This poor correlation between the ICD coding and confirmed diagnosis of GCA will impact the quality of data extracted from administrative health datasets for epidemiological and longitudinal studies. Selecting patients with two or more GCA coded episodes could improve the homogeneity of the cohort for recruitment into GCA studies, but a larger sample size study is required.

Indexed as

Clinical CodingGiant Cell ArteritisInternational Classification of DiseasesPatient DischargeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersWestern AustraliaACR/EULAR criteriaAdministrative health dataEpidemiologyGiant cell arteritisTemporal arteritisTemporal artery biopsy

Identifiers

PMID39982544
PMCPMC11845429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.