SynthesisLasers in medical science2025
Effects and parameterization of low-level laser therapy in diabetic ulcers: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-umbrella.
Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Qualitative Comparison of LED and LASER Effects on Cutaneous Wound Healing: A Systematic Review of Experimental Studies.Cell biochemistry and function · 2026Pooled it
- Dose-response and efficacy of 660-nanometer low-level laser therapy in healing diabetic foot ulcers: a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial.Lasers in medical science · 2025Trial
- Effects of Terminalia fagifolia mart. extract combined with photobiomodulation on diabetic foot ulcers: protocol for a randomized single-blind clinical trial.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
- Photobiomodulation and Low-Level Laser Therapy as Complementary Strategies in Diabetes Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Dosimetric parameters and clinical outcomes of photobiomodulation in diabetic neuropathy: a concise review.Lasers in medical science · 2025Review
- Dose-response and efficacy of 830-nanometer photobiomodulation in healing diabetic foot ulcers: randomized, double-blind, clinical trial protocol.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
- Identification of Neutrophil Extracellular Trap-Related Biomarkers in Diabetic Foot Ulcers Based on Bioinformatics.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to systematically verify the available systematic reviews and meta-analyses of Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in diabetic foot ulcer (DFUs) to identify the effects and optimal parameters of LLLT in the management of DFUs. This umbrella review was written according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) report items and registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (PROSPERO). The search for articles was performed in the Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase databases. The following terms were used: Diabetic Foot, Diabetic Neuropathies, Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Peripheral Neuropathy, Diabetic Foot Ulcer, LASER Therapy, Low-Level Light Therapy, LLLT, LASER Biostimulation, Low Intensity LASER Irradiation, Low Power LASER Irradiation, Low Intensity LASER Therapy, Low Power LASER Therapy. A search was performed in the references section of the included studies. The systematic review (SR) included studies that compared LLLT with non-therapeutic doses (parameters considered low to modify healing), sham irradiation, and conventional DFU treatment. The interventions were performed using red and infrared wavelengths. Although two studies included in the SR used wavelengths below 600 nm, these were combined with diodes with infrared wavelengths within the same device. Another study performed a comparative analysis of LLLT at different wavelengths (632 nm and 904 nm), with area reduction rates of 63.7% and 56.8%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference. This is study indicated that, compared with standard treatment and non-irradiation treatments, the use of photobiomodulation (PBM) with different parameters was effective in promoting UPD healing. Further studies are warranted to determine the ideal parameters for improving patient outcomes. (International Prospective Register of Systematic Review Registration number: CRD42022362447).
Indexed as
Identifiers
39982518What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.