Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39982516›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2025

Beyond boundaries: a location-based toolkit for quantifying group dynamics in diverse contexts.

Seth Elkin-Frankston, James McIntyre, Tad T Brunyé, Aaron L Gardony, Clifford L Hancock, Meghan P O'Donovan, Victoria G Bode, Eric L Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Seth Elkin-FrankstonCognitive Science Branch, US Army DEVCOM Soldier Center, Natick, MA, USA. seth.elkin-frankston.civ@army.mil.ORCID 0000-0002-8913-0199
James McIntyreCenter for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Tad T BrunyéCognitive Science Branch, US Army DEVCOM Soldier Center, Natick, MA, USA.
Aaron L GardonyCognitive Science Branch, US Army DEVCOM Soldier Center, Natick, MA, USA.
Clifford L HancockBiomechanics and Engineering Branch, US Army DEVCOM Soldier Center, Natick, MA, USA.
Meghan P O'DonovanBiomechanics and Engineering Branch, US Army DEVCOM Soldier Center, Natick, MA, USA.
Victoria G BodeBiomechanics and Engineering Branch, US Army DEVCOM Soldier Center, Natick, MA, USA.
Eric L MillerCenter for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation 1931978National Science Foundation 1934553U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Soldier Center W911QY1920003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing toolkits for analyzing movement dynamics in animal ecology primarily focus on individual or group behavior in habitats without predefined boundaries, while methods for studying human activity often cater to bounded environments, such as team sports played on defined fields. This leaves a gap in tools for modeling and analyzing human group dynamics in large-scale, unbounded, or semi-constrained environments. Examples of such contexts include tourist groups, cycling teams, search and rescue teams, and military units. To address this issue, we survey existing methods and metrics for characterizing individual and collective movement in humans and animals. Using a rich GPS dataset from groups of military personnel engaged in a foot march, we develop a comprehensive, general-purpose toolkit for quantifying group dynamics using location-based metrics during goal-directed movement in open environments. This toolkit includes a repository of Python functions for extracting and analyzing movement data, integrating cognitive factors such as decision-making, situational awareness, and group coordination. By extending location-based analytics to non-traditional domains, this toolkit enhances the understanding of collective movement, group behavior, and emergent properties shaped by cognitive processes. To demonstrate its practical utility, we present a use case utilizing metrics derived from the foot march data to predict group performance during a subsequent strategic and tactical exercise, highlighting the influence of cognitive and decision-making behaviors on team effectiveness.

Indexed as

Group ProcessesGeographic Information SystemsGroup DynamicsHumansMilitary PersonnelMovement

Identifiers

PMID39982516
PMCPMC11845657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.